• amelia@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    243
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 days ago

    This further illustrates how absolutely crazy it is to produce these devices for a single use and then just throw them away, not even making sure they can be recycled properly. It’s complete madness. I hope they’ll be banned soon, I think the EU is working on it.

      • Dremor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        14 days ago

        Disposable vapes are already forbidden, at least in France, idk if it is union wide.

        But yeah, those things make no sense. The only thing with a battery that should be disposable would be fire alarm. Not because of the battery, but because the main sensor has a 10 years lifespan due to its natural deterioration.

      • Farid
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        14 days ago

        Compared to a vape pen AirPods have insane life span. It’s still bad, but not even in the same ballpark as something you usually throw away in a week or so.

        • cookiecoookie@lemmy.worldBanned
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          14 days ago

          That’s fine for airpods but as someone who worked retail, there’s just as many $15 earbuds that break near instantly that have to be thrown away and never fixed. Those things have 3 batteries in them.

        • LlilL@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          13 days ago

          You can also have your dying AirPods replaced at the battery rate of $40 too. Still doesn’t strike the overall problem, especially since Apple doesn’t advertise that replacement.

          • Farid
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            14 days ago

            Not sure what you mean. Are you implying that because on occasion some people will lose an AirPod they are somehow worse than vape pods that are designed to be disposed of within days after first use?

            • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              14 days ago

              people who like the concept don’t give a fuck about the environment, it’s just convenient for them so fuck it.

              I’m sure you’ll justify it for yourself lol.

              you don’t need them, you just like them, and don’t care that it’s created an entire new class of ewaste.

              • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                13 days ago

                People lose phones more often, huge source of e-waste that we should ban first. In fact most people wouldn’t even have a reason to buy the earbuds if they didn’t have a phone in the first place.

                • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  13 days ago

                  People lose phones more often

                  something tells me they don’t just evaporate, never to be used used again, but resold.

                  hard to resell a single earbud.

  • HugeNerd@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    133
    ·
    14 days ago

    “it was actually a PY32F002B, powered by a 24 MHz Arm Cortex M0+ processor. The chip also carried 24KB of flash storage and 3KB of static RAM”

    To process a single button.

    • StarDreamer@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      56
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      14 days ago

      Because an existing SoC at scale is cheaper than a custom ASIC.

      You see this all the time, custom keyboard running ARM+Linux, SmartNICs using RISC-V cores/FPGAs instead of ASIC accelerators. Even Microsoft refuses to commit to ASICs for network processing in their DCs and use FPGAs instead.

      • wewbull@feddit.uk
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        40
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        14 days ago

        A vape is a battery connected to a button connected to a heating coil. You might want a single transistor. You don’t need a software platform.

        • I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          30
          ·
          14 days ago

          Sure, if you weren’t competing with every other vape out there that has things like variable voltage settings (at least 3), a pre-heat feature, the ability to turn on/off with 5 presses, or to turn off automatically after 5-10 minutes without use, a low battery indicator, a charging indicator, a broken coil indicator…

          Hmm, seems like you need a lot more than a battery, heating coil, button, and single transistor.

          • QueriesQueried@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            14 days ago

            With the major caveat that dispos dont offer more than 2 of those features at best. Almost all those features you specify are on reusable devices. There are going to be some that do have those additional features, but at a price point that makes them nearly as or more costly than a reusable device.

            The only IC you need for a disposable really, is a BMS, and a temp sensor (technically a timer so it also doesnt over draw, but timer ICs are built into everything) so it doesn’t willfully light itself on fire in unusual circumstances.

            All that to say: there is effectively 0 difference between most disposables released today and reusables, with the sole exception that you cant refill or recharge them. There should be no device with a battery deliberately intended to be thrown away, for anything, save for medical uses.

          • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            14 days ago

            You’re sooooo right, check my response to that guy. I was into vaping years ago and loved mechanical vaoes, which were legit just a battery, heating coil mounted to a platform, button, and conductive tube. Super simple devices, so easy!

            Except they’re INSANELY DANGEROUS! I loved them but I’ve had friends treat them carelessly and they WILL start on fire or even explode if not vented. You need a thorough understanding of Ohm’s law, batteries’ amperage limits, how to rewrap batteries with nicks in the wrap, and to never leave them unattended even with manual locking rings.

            The person you replied to mentions adding a transistor which would do nothing. Add some more bits and just like you said, you’re competing with fully functional vapes with all those features and they’re cheap as hell. The chips cost nearly nothing, so that’s the route they go. Those vapes aren’t impervious to blowing up, but they’re much safer than simple mechanical vapes.

        • Croquette@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          29
          ·
          14 days ago

          There is also a battery management system as well.

          M0 processors are dirt cheap, especially in bulk.

          They probably have a BMS library that takes a few Kb of flash.

          The time it would take to make the design cost effective wouldn’t be worth it.

          Slap a less than a dollar mcu and be done with it.

        • StarDreamer@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          14 days ago

          Disclaimer: I don’t smoke anything, so I don’t know any details.

          Wouldn’t a button connected to a heating coil be a fire hazard? Is there no automatic shut-off based on temperature? If you add enough safety features, it might end up costing about the same as an embedded SoC.

          • lyralycan@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            14 days ago

            All it would need is a thermal fuse/cutoff, like those in portable heating appliances (air fryers, grills etc.). I wonder what’s needed to include a 10 second on & 30 seconds disabled timer, maybe it’s cheaper

            • Ithral@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              14 days ago

              They also do some BMS stuff, and some support limited graphics and UI. Depedns on the moddle

            • wewbull@feddit.uk
              cake
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              14 days ago

              An RC circuit charging up to some threshold voltage. You can even make it adjustable with a variable resistor.

          • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            14 days ago

            You’re 100% correct. I have mechanical vapes—no safety cutoff, just an 18650 in a conductive tube with wire coils attached to posts. They’re amazing, and they’re extremely dangerous. Turning one into a protected vape with basic features like wattage adjustment? Way cheaper and easier to go SoC!

        • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          14 days ago

          I used to be into vaping and a big mechanical vape fan. I still have all of my old mech vapes! Those were what you’re thinking of—a button, a conducive body, and a coil or two mounted to a post. You pop an 18650 in, no transistor or resistors needed. You adjust your wattage by changing the way you wrap your coils, and your wire gauge. Generally I’d like to run around .2 ohms, which pushes about 18-20 amps out of the 18650s.

          These are NOT devices you want in the hands of regular people lawl. I’ve had friends in years past love how my setup was and get similar vapes for themselves. I’ve seen a burned-down backpack (RIP, all of his adderall XR), a table almost catch fire, and burnt carpet. No explosions because I told people “don’t get one of these, but if you’re not going to listen to me, for the love of glob make sure it’s vented.”

          Anyway, yeah no way anyone should have these except electronics enthusiasts. Even with locking rings, they can just start firing if the person using it isn’t super careful. Nice batteries rated for 30a pulse are 2USD more than the garbage batteries that love to vent or explode.

          You add in a transistor, that’s not gonna do anything. You add in a couple more things for protection and your cost is higher than it would have been by getting one of the chips in OP’s article, and you don’t have a nice interface for adjusting wattage and checking battery level and charging via USB and all that fun shit.

        • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          14 days ago

          i disagree with the single transistor. overcharge prevention requires something more (i am not a batteriologist don’t ask me what. i’d do it with a tesla coil because that’d look cooler)

          • wewbull@feddit.uk
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            14 days ago

            I was assuming it was disposable (as so many are) and therefore no charging circuit.

            • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              13 days ago

              Huh. The disposables I am occasionally “forced” to get (put it in a 510 thread gramma) have charging ports. I usually have to charge once or twice to get through the full gram.

              That being said, the good local dispo just rebranded and gave me a bunch of 510 batteries with the old name on them. These batteries are fantastic and look about the same size as the server in the article

        • teyrnon@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          14 days ago

          There is a little more to it, pressing the button 5 times turns it on and off. Three times often lets one cycle through power settings. But yeah, anything more than a very minimal programming is frankly suspicious.

          It could be a lot is used to get the charge right idk.

    • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      14 days ago

      Well the PY32F002B (costing a few cents) even though it has a 32-bit (entry level) ARM core @ 24MHz is literally cheaper than older and less powerful microcontrollers.

      Granted, if you don’t do anything else than react to a push button it’s still cheaper to use discrete electronic components than a microcontroller, but given that this device has a LiPo battery (meaning there’s battery control involved) and judging by the picture a USB-C connector, there’s probably a bit more digital logic in it, by which point a 3 cent microcontroller plus a cheap SMD crystal and some caps is cheaper than using discrete components.

      The domain of embedded systems has evolved to the point that it’s the best option for almost everything in consumer electronics, mainly because at the lower end there are so many stupidly cheap and easy to use choices were you don’t run an OS in it but instead just a single block of single-threaded code directly on the bare metal accessing registers directly.

      • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        14 days ago

        Temperature control, likely something to keep track of how much is left in the device, and I’m betting I’m forgetting something.

        I doubt discreet electronics can cut it at that point.

        • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          14 days ago

          Yeah, as per the analysis I did in another post, even a 555 and a couple of transistors to just blink an LED is more expensive than putting a microcontroller like this one there.

      • merdaverse@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        14 days ago

        It’s crazy to think that this is basically more powerful than the Apollo Guidance Computer that got people onto the moon. It costs 3 cents, and we use it for shit like this and then throw it away. What spectacular waste.

    • Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      13 days ago

      Yes, where “process” means measuring instantaneous changes in airflow as the user inhales (or doesn’t), and regulating a heating coil accordingly by running actual program code - which requires a controller to run it and memory to store it in. I mean when you click “Reply” on this page all it has to do is process one button, but that involves a lot.

      • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 days ago

        Some of them have games like snake you can play in class on them. I mean that’s what I assume its for, any adult would use their phone.

      • kevinsky@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 days ago

        All that logic is still a choice though. You could also just instruct the user to not press the button unless they’re inhaling and just actually have it be an on and of button. That’s how vapes used to work. Worst thing that could happen there is that you burn the wick, which is only a problem because it’s not serviceable.

    • Melobol@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      14 days ago

      There were couple series of: full lcd screen, bt connected to smartphone for notifications and a speaker versions. Plus the rechargeable battery and usb c charging port (obviously).
      It was selling about 35 bucks.
      Forgot the game one: had controller buttons and 3 games: pacman, tetris and a lying shooter inbuilt. With full lcd and speaker. (Thus wasnt bt connected tho) Price was similar.

  • onnekas@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    84
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    14 days ago

    Reusing them, even in small experimental projects, underscores a broader sustainability opportunity.

    Bigger opportunity would be banning this shit.

    • queueBenSis@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      14 days ago

      outright bans just allow black markets to flourish. harm reduction and public safety campaigns would go much further

        • new_world_odor@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          41
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          14 days ago

          As someone who vapes quite a bit, I would genuinely love to see this. Disposables are an absolute shitshow and never should have existed in the first place.

          • Squirrelanna@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            14 days ago

            Seriously. I struggle to fathom how running out for disposables is even slightly more convenient than refilling a proper tank every so often and replacing the coil. It tastes better, lasts longer and makes much less waste.

            • new_world_odor@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              edit-2
              14 days ago

              I think it’s the marketing of it. A decent amount of people I’ve talked to genuinely don’t know that there’s a reusable option. This also changed when the tobacco industry got involved. Vaping used to have more of a culture of cessation. It was talked about how you could transition from cigs at a higher nicotine level, then bring it down until you’re vaping zero nic, then quit that. I barely hear anyone talk about the quitting pipeline anymore. I don’t think it’s an accident, I think it’s intentional.

              Edit: I also think it’s the fact that you only have to buy one thing, and the 3 things (device, coils, juice) aren’t available in every gas station like disposables are. And the user experience - open the box and it starts right up, no refills, all it needs is a charge once in a while. People are really fucking lazy, by nature. But the cost of all those conveniences is indebted tenfold upon the environment, as destruction and waste.

              • Squirrelanna@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                13 days ago

                I can’t argue with that. I started to preemptively keep myself OFF of cigs (entire family smokes and I knew I would eventually pick up the habit). For a while now, most of the talk around it I’ve heard is just whether or not it’s cool or cringe rather than how it can be used to quit smoking.

                Maybe the disposables wouldn’t be so egregious if you could keep the battery like you used to be able to and just replace the disposable tanks. I think that’s what bothers me the most. We had an okay system before that wasn’t really complicated and wasn’t NEARLY as wasteful.

          • YeahToast@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            13 days ago

            Vapes should never have existed? Smoking rates and nicotine addiction were finally going down… Then the good old invention of the vape brings it rocketing back again.

          • new_world_odor@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            14 days ago

            There are some shops that will actually collect the vapes and send them back to the manufacturer for recycling. But it’s less common than it used to be, which frustrates me to no end, it should be the reverse if anything.

          • Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            14 days ago

            It makes you feel dirty, but the question is do you still do it anyway - and if the answer is yes, that’s the problem. because that’s what drives the whole industry.

            • new_world_odor@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              12 days ago

              Individuals having desires is not “the problem”. That would be corporations having free reign to behave however the fuck they want, so long as they can pay the fed.

              • Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                12 days ago

                There’s more than one problem. Even if politicians weren’t bribey and Citizens United didn’t give corps a license to bribe them, we would still have pollution and other problems because individuals choose convenience over doing the right thing - which is “the” problem I meant.

    • Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      14 days ago

      It’s probably cheaper and simpler to modify (say you suddenly want it to turn on when you click 3 times) to use a 0.1€ chip than to figure out how to do it and build it with discrete components.

      20 years ago I was all “computer (chips) can do everything! We can use them everywhere! Replaceable, reprogrammable, fantastic!”

      And no one cared.

      Now they are everywhere and it’s just a fucking mess 😔

      Maybe 20 years from now the EU will have forced standards onto everything and you can (again) fix your dishwasher (and start it from work!!1!).

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 days ago

      probably more expensive to make different mechanical components when a simple chip does it all for cheaper. how ev are cheaper than ice cars,

    • dil@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 days ago

      they made it harder to get pods and liquid for normal vapes compared to these, and because most ppl by these they primarily stock them

        • lechekaflan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          13 days ago

          That’s being changed, however, as a bunch of determined devs are using raycasting to go around the console’s limitations, being heavily optimized to run SNK’s arcade titles.

          • Float
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            13 days ago

            I hope someone accomplishes it, even if it’s single digit framerate.

            • Wispy2891@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              13 days ago

              He updated the video a few hours ago saying that some genius accomplished that

              Disclaimer: I didn’t actually watch the video, only saw the thumbnail on my feed

        • GutterRat42@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 days ago

          I have seen people run Doom on a pregnancy test, and you are telling me that the Neo Geo can’t run it!?

          • Float
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            11 days ago

            That video is a hoax. It’s a small screen inserted into a pregnancy test, cables run out the side which is never brought into frame.

            It seems since I have made this post that a huge amount of progress has been made in getting FPS games running on the neogeo.

      • YeahToast@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        13 days ago

        I’m curious who your sole downvoter was. Was it a potato producer that dislikes gaming ? Perhaps a lemon farmer who feels their fruit could run doom on 4k. Was it someone who purchased a $5000 dollar rig only to find out they could have bought a singular potato? I guess we’ll never know

  • Turbodad@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    14 days ago

    I don’t get those pieces of crap. There were these fancy electric cigarettes years ago, using those 3.7V rechargeable batteries. Custom designs (saw lightsaber designs), custom liquids, repairable, no e-waste. What is wrong with people to use those crapsticks? And why do those dumbnuts don’t get that these things are e-waste not residual waste?

    • Melobol@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      14 days ago

      They are too lazy to refill a pod, and replace a pod - not even a coil.
      They dont want to bother, and that’s too complicated and they would just loose it anyway - better to buy those throwaway ones.
      These are the most common excuses.

    • cookiecoookie@lemmy.worldBanned
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 days ago

      Instead of asking why people are buying disposables, ask why nobody is buying those reusable vapes. These disposable companies must be doing quite a few things better if people are willing to throw away money and tech.

      • JustEnoughDucks@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        14 days ago

        Price.

        That is what they do better.

        Many many MANY people would sooner buy something for 5 dollars 20 times then something for $100 once whether financial necessity or not feeling guilty for buying the super expensive thing.

        • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          14 days ago

          Not to mention people being too lazy to want to do even basic maintenance. Also companies that prefer to sell something people need to keep buying over and over might not offer a longer term version.

          Not vaping or even disposable, but my manscaped face trimmer, which is supposedly a higher end one, was the first electric trimmer I’ve gotten that didn’t come with a little bottle of lube and the instructions even said “you don’t need to lube this!” Knowing that they hadn’t changed the laws of physics, I lubed it anyways and I’m convinced that’s the only reason it hasn’t permanently seized up by now because even with the lube and a full charge, there have been times where it didn’t want to start going without a good tap after turning it on.

        • cookiecoookie@lemmy.worldBanned
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          14 days ago

          IMO it’s quality for the price more than just price, I’ve bought and used so many brands of refillable pods/tank mods and they always have quality problems that just don’t happen with the disposables. For anyone that’s experienced them, all I have to say is e-juice leakage.

  • Pollo_Jack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    14 days ago

    As a manufacturer/seller of disposable vapes, literally everyone wants refillable tanks.

    Obviously the customer does too but we’re vertically integrated. We grow, extract, flavor, fill, and sell. Managing the logistics from China sucks and requires a decent amount of overbuying to ensure we have a steady stream. You never know when some orange retard will close up the border to x country that makes your stuff.

    I’d love to just have a CoA of the distillate, flavor mixer like a coke machine, and a fill nozzle for the customer to hand to the cashier to fill.

    • kevinsky@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      13 days ago

      What happened to vaping?

      I specifically remember refillable vaping was exactly what you had when you vaped. You had the battery unit or a “mod” as it was called, on top of that you screwed a tank that had the coils, cotton and liquid, all that shit could be individually replaced and everybody had their own frankensteins combination of mod tank and other peripherals they liked to use.

      Why did that stop being a thing in favor of these absurdly wasteful disposable pens?

      • Sylvartas@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        13 days ago

        Not sure what they’re implying about being forced to sell non refillable vapes. I bought a Centaurus kit (refillable) two years ago and they’re still selling. Though the same brand also has lines of disposables…

        In reality the people buying disposables don’t want to deal with the hassle that is e-juice (and changing coils). But the modern refillables are pretty good at not leaking every time you look at them wrong, though in my experience the big ones still don’t like being upside down.

      • Regrettable_incident@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        12 days ago

        Yeah I’ve still got some of mine somewhere. I think the main reason the disposables took the market was partly that they are much cheaper, and partly that many people think they taste better. In my country the government has mandated that they be rechargable and have the flavour thingies replaceable, so they are, but they still seem to get thrown away a lot.

    • Schlemmy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      13 days ago

      At the early days we had just that. I bought vegetable glycerine, nicotine and some flavour we were set.

    • 7101334@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 days ago

      …commodified cannabis is garbage and distillate is hotdog water, though

  • Armand1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    14 days ago

    24 MHz Arm Cortex M0+ processor. The chip also carried 24KB of flash storage and 3KB of static RAM.

    … a 10y old phone can barely load Google, and this is about 100x slower.

    Wild that you can serve anything with that hardware. Granted, static websites are basically just sending files over the wire.

    • BCsven@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      14 days ago

      The 10 year old phone OS probably is slowing all of that. If they flashed phone as a dedicated webserver it would probably be fine

    • disorderly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      14 days ago

      The webpage he hosted was a copy of his own blog post explaining the hack. It just about fit into the 20KB of available flash storage.

      We can infer that on every request, the whole static page needs to be spooled out of flash onto RAM (in chunks no larger than 3k), then sent out over Ethernet.

      That’s an awful lot of work for the chip. I’m not surprised at all that it errors out under heavy load. The request queue probably grows until it collides with the buffer that bucket brigades the web page to the network.

      I’m afraid to look up what optimizations were necessary to get that level of performance. It’s damned impressive work.

      • Lumisal@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        14 days ago

        Ah, but what if you string together 100 of these as a cluster? Now u get a whole 2Mb of flash storage!

        • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          14 days ago

          Yeah, I think I had 2-4MB, but it was a long time ago, so I could be mistaken.

          It also had an FPU addon, which I don’t think the M0 has.

      • Omgpwnies@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        14 days ago

        When I was a kid we had a 386-33MHz with 4MB RAM, it ran Doom at about 1-2FPS. Upgraded to a 486 DX (66MHz I think?) and 8MB RAM and it ran great on that. It’s possible that the 386 would have been fine if we put more RAM in though, I think the biggest issue was swapping.

        • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          14 days ago

          Set it to low quality and hit Ctrl+Minus until the window is the size of a postage stamp and it’s buttery smooth.

    • pirat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      14 days ago

      Ok here’s my trillion dollar idea:

      SmartVape CloudBar. A range of premium smart home vaping devices that connect to (and depend on) the cloud so you can smartvape remotely (e.g. in the bed, on the job, or even when travelling).

      Vaping, even locally, always works, unless your subscription has expired, there’s no internet connection available, or any of the necessary cloud service are down.