• pomegranatefern@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    215
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    In looking into this, what I am able to find indicates that this is a lawmaker (Rep Justin Pearson) and his brother (KeShaun Pearson) who is not a lawmaker and was there protesting GOP lawmakers splitting the city of Memphis where they both live into three districts, diluting the Black vote after a Supreme Court ruling badly gutting what was left of the Voting Rights Act. It appears that KeShaun was detained. Rep Pearson was not, and I am unclear from the video and article whether state troopers forcibly removed Rep Pearson or if he chose (understandably) to leave in order to watch out for his brother who was being detained.

    This is the article on it i was able to find. https://www.actionnews5.com/2026/05/08/video-shows-tense-moment-between-rep-pearson-state-troopers-brother-detained-tenn-capitol/

    Just so we’re clear, this is still a bad thing that happened and is happening. Jim Crow is returning before our eyes. I just believe, based on what I’ve been able to find, that this screenshot contains inaccurate specifics of the details.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      96
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      this is still a bad thing that happened and is happening

      Yeah, but being accurate matters

      Muddying the waters always helps fascists more than anyone.

      Facts still matter.

    • RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      I mean adding an S to words still indicates a plural state, right? Because this definitely says Lawmakers, with an S. As in more than one. Multiple. Am I losing my fucking mind? Do I need to go back to first grade and learn basic grammar, again? Because I’m just gonna disengage if everyone’s gonna lie to me every time I turn around.

      • pomegranatefern@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 months ago

        I’m a little confused by this comment, sorry. By “this,” do you mean the image? It does say lawmakers, plural, and also specifies two. The image seems to be incorrect. I’m not assuming malice, and I believe they were probably posting with bad or incomplete information. Details of situations like this can be unclear as you’re trying to follow them at home. But they said lawmakers, plural, and it is in fact a lawmaker, singular, who was not actually arrested, and his non-lawmaker brother, who was.

        If you’re talking about something in the article I shared, could you quote the passage that has you confused?

    • mannycalavera@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      21
      ·
      4 months ago

      this screenshot contains inaccurate specifics of the details.

      Why would someone do that? On Lemmy. Why?

  • BigMacHole@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    63
    ·
    4 months ago

    Arresting BLACK PEOPLE who want to Vote is how you KNOW Republicans are NOT Racist!

    -Log Cabin Republicans!

    • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yes and according to the conservative super majority of the Supreme Court, racism in election polls doesn’t exist anymore apparently.

        • ponypuncher@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          It’s a good lesson. People who reach positions of power are only able to do so because they are motivated purely by their own self-interest. Keeping her position was in her self-interest. Even the people who appear on “your side” are only in that position for themselves. The higher they get the less incentive they have to make performative sacrificies. Which they all are. Always and forever.

          • TerdFerguson@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            It’s only true in this system that rewards the self-serving individual. I don’t believe this is implicit to human nature, but we have to be willing to collectively punish bad actors severely, rather than shrug and look the other way as these people misbehave.

            The violent struggle is inevitable at this point, its really now just about how may times you’ll let yourself be punched in the face until you punch back.

            • ponypuncher@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 months ago

              That is the system though. The world would be a better place if we had leaders not motivated by their self-interest. But those leaders don’t get into positions of power. So, they don’t functionally exist other than to pat themselves on the back for suffering for their principles in their own minds that effect zero change or progress. I don’t say it to be cynical, either. It’s just reality. There are only a handful of people throughout history who reached high enough levels of power to actual change things for the better that were actually willing to sacrifice themselves for their principles. And most of them suffered for it and the only reward they got was a legacy.

              You are not punching anyone in the face. And telling other people they are lazy or bad for not pretending otherwise doesn’t make it anymore true that you are. You’re just someone shouting a lie at a person who is sick of being shouted at and wondering why no one is doing what you want them to do.

              • TerdFerguson@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 months ago

                You are not punching anyone in the face. And telling other people they are lazy or bad for not pretending otherwise doesn’t make it anymore true that you are. You’re just someone shouting a lie at a person who is sick of being shouted at and wondering why no one is doing what you want them to do.

                That’s quite the story you’ve invented for me. I didn’t call anyone lazy or bad, and I’m wholly confused at what lie I’m supposedly shouting here.

                I can imagine that you’re frustrated by your own inability to effect the change you would like to see. Totally understandable.

  • Rothe@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    4 months ago

    Don’t worry white Americans. You did nothing because this did not affect you yet. Everything is fine, and there is a new show on Apple TV.

  • Hylactor@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    4 months ago

    As it becomes more difficult to merely live, it becomes easier to risk it all. We are witnessing the origin story of the next great revolutionary.

    • mycodesucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      32
      ·
      4 months ago

      That’s the kind of thing I hear from protest non-voters all the time.

      Worked out REALLY well for Hong Kong, let me tell you.

      • Insekticus@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        4 months ago

        The difference is the Hong Kong citizens weren’t installed in all levels of local, state, and federal position within the government.

        The amount of buildings getting destroyed and groups popping up all over America from California to New York will be way too big of a theatre for a federal government as deeply incompetent and corrupt as this one is, from stopping them in any meaningful way.

        Hong Kong resisted an outside military with the forces and wealth of an invading army.

        Yours is a false dichotomy.

        • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 months ago

          I think you meant false equivalence.

          A false dichotomy presents two options as if they are the only choices available when in reality there are other options.

          A false equivalence draws a comparison between two things that are actually disparate.

          I’m neither agreeing nor disagreeing with you or the person you replied to. Just letting you know the correct term for what you described.

        • Tollana1234567@lemmy.todayBanned
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          THAT DINT seem like the case for HK, they were most definitely taken over pretty quick, and without much resistance. thier govt was mostly appointed by ccp approved in the first place.

  • Sgt_choke_n_stroke@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    4 months ago

    Riots are the language of the unheard. I don’t ever want to hear pissing and moaning from Republicans when there shit hole state burns down

  • FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    What the fuck is going on here? It can’t get much more blatantly fascist. I implore anyone who can leave the Untied States to do so

  • irish_link@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    4 months ago

    My instinct with all news now is to think there MUST be more going on here behind the scenes.

    Then I think to myself “who runs the county?” and realize we are on our way to hell. It’s time to stand up before all who could and would stand up are taken before no one is left.

    • muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      The plan for November is to cheat and if that fails, ignore it. There is no blue rescue happening.

      By all means, vote anyways. If all you can do is inconvenience a fascist, definetly do so.

  • bthest@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    4 months ago

    Black Americans, the heart and soul of Democratic party for 50 years… they’re gone as voting bloc.

    I hope riding Israel’s dick was worth it.

      • bthest@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        No, black Americans voted the least for Trump than any other demographic in 2024 and 2016.

        They were the most reliable blue strait ticket bloc. But that’s over. They’re erasing their districts all over the country.

        I mean this is the election cancellation. Getting it out of the way early.

  • SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    4 months ago

    Just give it up. The USA is done for. Complete shit hole. Flee now, cause it’s only going to get worse.

    • Hadriscus@jlai.luBanned
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 months ago

      And leave those who can’t flee alone with the nazis? let the country be seized, in control of the most funded army in the world?

      There is no way forward with that thinking. There is only one way to a bright future, it is to fight the nazis, to fight relentlessly, to win, then to educate, and finally to disarm. Remember 1945

  • YoiksAndAway@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    4 months ago

    Congratulations, Officers Moustache and Shorty! You just entered the history books on the wrong side!

  • JojoWakaki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    4 months ago

    As an foreigner and outsider. Does USA not have a system of designated opposition? Isn’t it their duty to keep the government in check? Am I missing something? I don’t even know who is the opposition leader no more. I assume the president nominee who didn’t win is the opposition leader? Haven’t seen or heard anything major since the election.

    • Smoogs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 months ago

      Their cute little system they attempted at checks and balances are no longer balanced.

      • JojoWakaki@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        I saw the piece about 'shadow docket" by Last week tonight this morning on youtube. It is quite timely, very infuriating, and scary.

    • McGuirk808@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      There is no specific appointment for the losing presidential nominee. They just lose and move on.

      The idea with the US government is checks and balances between government branches. Congress and SCOTUS have some degree of power over the president and each branch can keep the other two in check. Historically it has worked well, but things have been changing quickly in the last 10-20 years, but especially with the two Trump admins.

      The current situation with Trump is particularly different for a few reasons:

      • Trump is incredibly popular with primary right-wing voter base. There is evidence this may be changing, but it’s been the case for 10+ years now.
      • Trump’s popularity has allowed him to put intense pressure on members on congress. He can threaten to primary any sitting senator or representative that doesn’t support everything he does. These threats are not empty and he has absolutely gotten people voted out of office due to his clout with republican voters. Most Republican members of congress are terrified of opposing him. Since republicans currently hold majority, congress is more or less toothless and completely deferential to Trump right now.
      • Two supreme court justice positions became open when Republicans had control of the government, so they have shifted SCOTUS leanings strongly to the right.

      Trump has a perfect storm of control over the systems normally in-place to hold him accountable.

      Once we have an administration ran by adults in power again, we’re going to need to seriously re-evaluate and update our system of checks and balances, or future administrations will continue to exploit these problems until the country rots and dies.

      • JojoWakaki@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        The problem is, it’s the thing that happens with the current government doing things so their place in power is secured. And the other thing about boiling the frog slowly with very short temperature rises, so it doesn’t notice it’s being boiled until it’s too late.

        At some point it will be too late to change as change prevention will be written in the system, if it already isn’t. People like to throw in the word ‘status-quo’ but I don’t understand that term at all.

      • squaresinger@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        In a proper political system?

        • Inform the electorate about shit the government is doing
        • Suing the government in front of an unpolitical, independent court, up to an unpolitical, independent supreme court
        • Bargaining with the government on regular laws for whenever the government needs a 2/3 majority (e.g. for constitutional amendments, which should be a regular thing, not a once-in-a-lifetime event)
        • Running a shadow cabinet where each shadow minister is completely up-to-date to everything that happens so that in case the opposition wins the next election they can hit the ground running

        Just to name a few things.

        But since the USA doesn’t have unpolitical, independent courts and not even an unpolitical, independent supreme court, and constitutional amendments are exceedingly rare, the opposition is pretty worthless.

        Just for reference: If you take out the zero-day fixes (all amendments that were passed within the first year) and the two amendments that cancel each other out (18 and 21), the USA has had 15 constitutional amendments. France had 15 full constitutional rewrites in the same time.

        • JojoWakaki@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          This was what I meant opposition doing the job.

          I think it is very important thing engaging the electorate when they are not in power and when it’s not election season. By both the government and opposition. And more importantly to do that neutral to reach all the electorate not their own voter base. I think that is what is missing form the US and it is increasing the divide between the left and right to the point the key identity (with pride) of each political party is that they aren’t the other one.

          • squaresinger@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            The US system is a hot broken mess. It’s 200 years outdated and nobody dared fixing it.

            It’s literally a prototype of a democracy that people started to treat like a religion.

            The constitutionally mandated two-party-system is perfect at dividing the nation and makes sure that cross-party coalitions aren’t a thing, thus voiding all need for any cooperation.

            • JojoWakaki@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 months ago

              “The alternate domination of one faction over another, sharpened by the spirit of revenge, natural to party dissension, which in different ages and countries has perpetrated the most horrid enormities, is itself a frightful despotism.”

              From George Washington’s farewell address, 1796.

              Basically, he was worried about ‘us vs them’ mentality that the two party system would bring as there was already a divide between the federalists and the democratic-republicans.

              • squaresinger@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 months ago

                Yeah, it was a problem from day 1, but they did jack all to fix it.

                Probably because changing a system usually doesn’t benefit those who got into power via the old system.

      • JojoWakaki@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        I am not an expert on the political system. But my knee jerk answer is idk, Oppose? But there is probably a lot I don’t understand of “this is how it’s done and this is how it is” -ism that goes on.

        • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          I mean they do, do that. It doesn’t hit the media much, because they like to appease Trump. But they are constantly making every piece of legislation hard to pass.

  • Clutter@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    4 months ago

    Has nothing to do with 2026. This is not happening un France or Germany or Italy, Canada, Australia, India, the whole south America, etc, etc.

    Just in that shithole country that voted in a shit dictator (not even a good one) and refuses to use their second amendment for what it was designed for…

    Goodbye, I’m done.

    • Clutter@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      I’m just so mad and angry at American exceptionalism but also see this clear racism.

      And nobody is teaching that megalomaniacal mango Mussolini a lesson…

      • Clutter@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        That does not even matter… True or false, result is the same. In fact, it makes the non-use of the 2nd Amendment even worse.

          • Clutter@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            Not my problem to deal with. If it was in the EU… I would. Even without the support of a literal constitutional right to do so.

              • Clutter@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 months ago

                Agreed. Or better put: I understand. But I do know for sure it will be easier to fight him and fascism in general NOW then in a few months. Let alone years.

                The more people he get’s under his thumb, the less are available to fight back.

      • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        Don’t mind the third of the US that supports him. Election rigging or not, there are a lot of stupid Americans out there itching for a dictator daddy.

      • plyth@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Then you voted for electronic elections before. It has always been said that they are not secure.