• gdog05@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      8 months ago

      They at least want the idea that we can’t trust the results, no matter what they are, as a standard. After watching videos from DEFCON, I definitely don’t trust the last election results.

    • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      8 months ago

      Chances Republicans lose the Senate -near 0. For Congress to pass anything it would have to go through both houses, so even if they somehow flipped the house (which may be unlikely with all the gerrymandering happening) it wouldn’t be possible.

      • OneSpectra@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        I think they will lose both the Senate and the House because of import tarriffs, farms going out of business, and cutting medicare and snap. Small and medium size businesses that are heavily dependant on imports will be strained under these tariffs.

        • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Idaho, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Mississippi, Nebraska, North Carolina, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, West Virginia, Wyoming.

          We need 5 of those to flop to Democrat, without a single Democrat seat flopping.

          Seats I think they maybe could able to win: Maine, North Carolina.

          That would put Republicans at 51 seats + the VP That’s assuming the Dems fill all the empty slots as well and keep the independents agreeing with them.

  • Brkdncr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    8 months ago

    Yes. I’d go a step further and give native Americans representation similar to statehood too.

    • GraniteM@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      The U.S. government recognizes 574 American Indian tribes and Alaska Native entities. Give each of them two senators, one representative, and three electoral votes, and suddenly the white man’s government becomes a minority adjunct to the new native government. I’d say let’s give it a try and see how it goes!

  • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    8 months ago

    If the Democrats win nothing will change.

    They will continue to push the overton window, as they keep the seat warm for the next right wing fascist.

    This is what Democrats have done with power over the last 50 years.

    We either get ranked choice voting going, or elect a 3rd party, otherwise we stay on the same path the Duopoly was designed to keep us trapped on.

  • mercano@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    8 months ago

    It’s not just the House, the Senate and the President also need to be on board. The House passing a resolution would at least illustrate who’s holding things up, though.

    • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      8 months ago

      The Senate needs to be board, but not the president. The president doesn’t have veto power as it is not a bill. Ratification of a state is just Congress. (And there is no way the Republicans will lose both sides of Congress)

    • chuckleslord@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Unfortunately, they made that known by boycotting the 2020 vote for statehood. The vote makes it look like they want to be a state and that might be all that congress bothers to look at.

  • surph_ninja@lemmy.worldBanned
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Democrats are praising ICE and defending genocide. What in the world makes you think they’d do anything progressive, if they won a majority?

  • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    8 months ago

    Statehood or independence for Puerto Rico and while we’re at it the Pacific islands and any other colonial possessions.

    DC can be rolled into Virginia just fine as the compromise.

    • Auli@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      So Hawaii gets to represent itself? Or not since it’s a state.

  • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 🇮 @pawb.socialBannedBanned from community
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    8 months ago

    Does DC want to be or even have a reason to be its own state? I thought it specifically wasn’t a state to be “fair” somehow.

    Peurto Rico, OTOH, certainly wants to (or wanted to previously; IDK how they feel currently). Also Guam and the US Virgin Islands.

  • AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    It’ll mess up the flag (51 or 52 stars don’t go into a regular grid), so they’ll need a one-in-one-out policy. A start could be merging the Dakotas and Carolinas.

      • Fredthefishlord@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 months ago

        Having 2 festering heeps of authoritarianism next to your country is less than ideal. A strong handed attempt to reform them would be better, like an external board to determine their districts (though it’d require an amendment to the constitution)

        • marsza@lemmy.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          Disagree entirely. Reform is less possible than eviction. If the federal government said “we will allow it” then Florida and Texas would overwhelmingly vote to Amerexit.

          And shit, let’s just let the south have all of it back. Let them reform themselves. Slavery? Not my problem.

  • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    8 months ago

    gop would never agree to it in the senate. Also old guard DNC doesnt seem keen on giving statehood as would the gop, it will just include too many problems for them

  • klemptor
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    They should offer it and both DC and PR should get to vote on the issue.

      • klemptor
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        True but I feel like if it’s offered to DC it should also be offered again to PR to be fair and in case sentiment has shifted.

  • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    I am going to pick a bone about Puerto Rico. Why do some Americans would like to try to give statehood to Puerto Rico? Literally half of Puerto Ricans can’t decide on whether they want to be fully independent, or completely integrate with the US! Let the Puerto Ricans decisively settle it themselves, before mainland Americans debate whether they should grant the island statehood.