The kind who spends more time compiling than using my system.

Hey Netflix, I have an idea for a show.

Literally anything that doesn’t mention AI at all. There’s enough vomit on my TV already.

Well, you can look at the description of the video where it says among other things “I use some form of AI application to make all my videos and have for the last 3 years”.

As others have mentioned, the video you posted is (largely/mostly?) AI-generated content. And I think a fair amount of Lemmy users (like myself) are pretty rabidly disdainful of anything AI-generated and will object to anything AI-generated that’s posted. (Rightfully so IMO.)

Yup.

Slop.

Not sure I see the point of impeaching Noem when Trump is right there.

Wait, where’s Gentoo?

Do they though? I think the one thing nearly every US American can agree on is that shit’s fucked. They all disagree on the cause or solution. (And half of people are high on fascist propaganda from FOX news or worse. And they’re the ones actively causing the worst problems in the country.) But I don’t think there’s any significant amount of people in the US thinking “yeah, this is how a country should be.” It’s just that some are like “we’re fucked because capitalism” and others are like “we’re fucked because we haven’t killed all the brown people yet”. (And even the ones who are a little less delusional, are throwing their hands up saying “too bad there’s nothing we can do about it”.)

FLOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOR

All he can hear is “ch”.

The mind of man is holy.

@frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml’s solution looks right to me, but is there also at least one other solution that’s also a checkmate in 2?

• Knight takes B5.
• Black is forced to take B5 with either the knight on C3 or the rook on F5. (The white knight on B5 puts the king in check, and there’s no way the king can move out of check, leaving taking the knight as the only option. There are two options for taking the white knight, but neither will save black from…).
• Queen to C4, which is checkmate. (The black king can’t take C4 because that square is protected by the white king. And the black king has no other options for moving out of check.)

Edit: Ah. Never mind. I see my mistake now. The black rook taking B5 puts the white king in check which throws a wrench in the “solution” above. Mine isn’t a solution. Good puzzle!

Does that come in pill form?

It’s 4chan. It’s definitely made up.

Censored, maybe? No idea, but I’m not seeing anything you’re not seeing.

This sounds like a fun project, and perhaps quite innovative! I’m excited by it and I hope it goes well!

Thanks! I’m kindof on a weird personal quest to make as many DSLs for accomplishing traditionally GUI-based, point-and-click-adventure sort of use cases as possible. Here is my previous (slightly-less-ambitious) installment in that quest.

If I were in your shoes, I’d probably choose the AGPL. It sounds to me like your library is quite innovative, and might contain some useful features that don’t exist in other similar projects?

Yeah, I’m leaning pretty strongly toward AGPL at this point. I was already leaning that way before making my post, and both aurtzy’s post (and more-so the article they linked to) and your post have clinched it. That “codecomic” thing I linked to earlier, I originally published under GPL, but just now switched it to AGPL. While I hold the copyright on the whole thing is probably the best time to do that. Heh. (Well, second-best, right after “before I published it” would have been, but at least if I change it now, I can ensure that only the very first version doesn’t have the whole Affero-specific provision.)

There is no definitive answer, since the license depends on the copyright system itself for the definition of a derived work.

That’s all fascinating. In my case, I’m writing it in Go which I believe, by default, statically links against libraries and includes other Go code on a source basis rather than via linking. But Go does have a way to do runtime-loadable code. (“Plugins” if you will.) That plugin system is only kindof half-supported, though. (It’s not supported at all on Windows in recent days.)

Anyway, a ramble of my own, but I guess it informs a bit under exactly which theories others’ code could end up being derivative and under which theories others’ code wouldn’t be derivative.

The more leverage you have (features, quality, more mindshare etc.), the more you can use that to push for copyleft.

Yeah, I’m pretty sure there’s nothing out there much like what I’m working on. So I guess the whole “if it does something unlike what anything else out there does”, definitely applies. Once it’s published and the idea that there could exist a DSL for making things like game assets is out there, someone else could implement a different design/implementation of the same basic vision from scratch (even learning a bit from the trail I’m blazing) just to avoid having any copyleft-ish sort of obligations, but of course that’s an investment that companies have declined to undertake many times, opting instead to just blatantly violate the GPL. (Look at the Vizio suit, for instance.) So that’s probably a pretty solid argument for just going AGPL rather than going for anything like LGPL or anything.

Quality: I guess remains to be seen. Lol. Mindshare: well, that rounds to zero at the moment, but a couple of folks have expressed interest.

I do expect I’ll be publishing something soon – probably in the next couple of months. Definitely an “alpha” sort of thing with much room for improvement, but I’ll probably publish it once it reaches a point of being minimally-able-to-provide-some-utility while being something I’m ok with having my name/reputation connected to.

Anyway! Great stuff. Thanks for your answer. It definitely helped!

Right? I thought I was in /c/greentext@lemmy.ml for a minute.

Don’t like your protein shakes? You’ll love the taste of this one, guaranteed.

This is exactly the kind of thing I’m looking for, thanks!