• Australis13@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    1 month ago

    This is how you create people like Nightmare Eclipse.

    These people are going out of their way to responsibly disclose vulnerabilites to the bug bounty programs and being treated poorly as a result. Granted, AMD technically didn’t have to pay since it was a MITM attack, but they could have at least handled the whole interaction better.

  • pulsewidth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 month ago

    $10k is nothing to AMD. The middle-management bean counters making these decisions are actively harming their company’s (and user’s security.

    • bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      The flaw of not using HTTPS for the downloads is so basic it’s shocking they didn’t have internal tooling to raise this before it was shipped. I’m not familiar with AMD’s bug bounty policy but they should have at least paid $1337 to the researcher for raising this to them.

  • WPSteam@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 month ago

    Nightmare Eclipse 2.0 incoming. 10K for such a thing is absolutely nothing for companies like AMD. Why promise rewards if at the end, you don’t intend to pay? This has been a growing trend in the bug bounty space. Many times a bug is marked as duplicate and is fixed secretly. Other times, they’re straightaway rejected…