

This article is all over the place.
The author points out from the outset that Warner Brothers has been a disaster for both creatives and profiteers under Zaslav for the last 5 years; he’s a wrecking ball of man and his friends (personal and political) paint a picture of a piece of shit.
It then points out that equally huge (or hugher?) piece of shit David Ellison had made a hostile takeover bid for Warner Bros to merge it with Paramount, which would be assisted by his pals Trump and Kushner, which he quickly moves on from without mentioning that it would definitely be bad for the future of cinema, and media competition creating a huge media conglomerate.
Next there’s some Netflix history which is more than a little slanted towards the Hollywood elitist, and the Netflix CEO (Sarandos) is painted as the bad guy for pointing out that cinema is dying because everyone has pretty good, large TVs and fast internet nowadays and the cinema is expensive as fuck. Only to state that these statements “are misleading”… but then back it up with… Agreeing?
The theatrical industry is dominated by oversize multiplexes that program bad movies, charge too much money, and are in inconvenient malls and suburban lots that can only be reached by car.
But what Sarandos fails to say is that legacy Hollywood studios like Warner Bros. are largely responsible for creating this paradigm.
Like… If your counterargument to Sarandos’s statements about the cinema industry dying is “yeah well only by most metrics and you’re twisting it because it’s largely Warner Bros fault” that is a terribly counter-argument.
Even more baffling is the claim:
Warner Bros., for its part, has managed to find continued success with theatrical releases, both blockbuster franchises (the DC universe) {and two small budget indie films that turned into hits and tripled their budgets, for a business nonetheless still bleeding profits}
The DC Universe is WB’s leading success story? The universe with famously more flops than box office winners??
I agree with his assessments that the buyout and merger will be bad for cinemas, competition, are likely in breech of antitrust laws, and I agree with his assessment that the companies should be broke up - but the meat of this article feels like it’s so out of touch with reality.
In reality, antitrust will not happen - Trump hates regulations and he loves bribes, so one of three things will happen. And if the choice is between Zaslav continuing to fuck WB, Ellison buying out and merging it with Paramount, or Netflix absorbing WB… The least-shit choice to me is obvious.














Entire poster could be summarised as: treat other people with respect and empathy.