• Makeitstop@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    1 month ago

    The first panel severely undersells the massive progress that renewables have made over the last couple of decades. And unfortunately, that just plays into the myth the things like wind and solar are weak and impractical, which is one of the main narratives pushed by opponents of clean energy.

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yeah, Texas is increasingly powered by solar and the American Midwest by wind. There’s the Scottish offshore wind farms too. In places oil is extracted, it’s increasingly the primary source of new electricity generation facilities

  • orlyowl@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 month ago

    I changed it to AI so precisely that no one would ever know it wasn’t the original image. Well ok, I actually sloppily pasted it in with a white box, but good enough I say!

    image

  • quick_snail@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Except that bitcoin replaces an industry that uses magnitudes more energy than it.

    • Honytawk@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Hahaha, no. Not even close.

      Especially if Bitcoin were to make the same amount of daily transactions as the industry it would “replace”. The energy consumption is exponential on that piece of shit.

      The only thing Bitcoin replaces is braincells.

      • quick_snail@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        The energy consumption is static, no matter how much scale up there is.

        Stop spreading misinformation.