I mean the viewers of the video.
- 4 Posts
- 329 Comments
I know, but as a physical, mobile object as a camera is involved I imagine it’s much more vulnerable to man-in-the-middle attacks than today’s TLS certificates for sites. There are more moving parts / physical steps and the camera is probably not always online.
But in essence you are right, operating the camera the same way as a server should be possible of course. We need some basic trusted authorities that are as trusted as we have for our current TLS certificates.
What it will prove, is whether the video is actually of a specific camera certificate. Not who owns the camera, if it has been swapped or if the video footage is real.
But if you don’t actually check the physical camera and prove that key for yourself, then it can easily be faked by generating a key that is not coming from the camera and is used for the “proof” video and the fake video.
But how would one simple member of the audience easily determine if this whole chain of events is valid, when they don’t even get how it works or what to look out for?
You’d have to have a public key of trusted sources that people automatically check with their browser, but all the steps in between need to be trusted too. I can imagine it is too much of a hassle for most.
But then again, that has always been the case for most.
But you get rusty in moist environments; when you urinate you slowly rot away your urethra.
ERASED is about a guy reliving his life as a young school kid, with awkward moments around romantic feelings. While I do think it kind of fits the story, I think it does not go well with the requirements.
With this classy response of his it’s almost better for his perceived character than when he didn’t say it.
No action whatsoever is being done purely for someone else’s sake.
It depends, I believe actual tape keeps data usable way longer than CDs.
Also not a fan to say the least.
It’s cutting my programming work in half right now with quality .NET code. As long as I stay in the lead and have good examples + context in my codebase, it saves me a lot of time.
This was not the case for co-pilot though, but Cursor AI combined with Claude 3.7 is quite advanced.
If people are not seeing any benefit, I think they have the wrong use cases, workflow or tools. Which can be fair limitations depending on your workplace of course.
You could get in a nasty rabbit hole if you vibe-code too much though. Stay the architect and check generated code / files after creation.
Well, in many other systems you have an overarching ruling layer that sets laws and is able to enforce them from a top level.
That is precisely the reason why those systems can be relatively stable. As you just have a very large group of people following the same set of rules.
I like the idea of anarchism, but I see it as more of an ideal world view than an actual stable reality.
To support this, every group member of every group must almost unanimously support the concept. When resources or safety in an area become scarce, it’s easy for some groups to evolve back into another power structure to take care of their own people.
It’s really difficult for me to imagine everybody on this planet getting along with this. But I’m certainly interested in other viewpoints.
For a minute I thought the dogs were running around devastated by the wildfires. I imagined them racing around in full panic with seeds shaking off their backs, intensifying the wildfires.
I need to sleep.
tweeks@feddit.nlto
Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world•I wonder if the "money can't buy you happiness" people ever lived in a car.
6·11 months agoThere have been studies that claim there is a max on what money can buy you in terms of happiness. Before it was said to be 70k (of course depends on the country), now it might be 500k.
tweeks@feddit.nlto
Reddit@lemmy.world•Therewasanattempt to remove the doge employees email list.
6·11 months agoWell, not that I approve of the practice, but you could find site logins that the email is used in, breaches that it’s been in (potentially finding (old) passwords).
With that info, if not for identity theft directly, can be used for fishing and profiling.
Maybe he is over a thousand years old, don’t you see the wrinkles?
tweeks@feddit.nlto
No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world•Do you feel like you've reached the end of what the world has to offer?
2·1 year agoThis is a brilliant description; the feeling OP has is probably on a way more abstract level than most of the comments here are thinking of.










Why mix up all the numbers, but not numbers 9, 5 and 6?