• 4 Posts
  • 329 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 12th, 2023

help-circle


  • I know, but as a physical, mobile object as a camera is involved I imagine it’s much more vulnerable to man-in-the-middle attacks than today’s TLS certificates for sites. There are more moving parts / physical steps and the camera is probably not always online.

    But in essence you are right, operating the camera the same way as a server should be possible of course. We need some basic trusted authorities that are as trusted as we have for our current TLS certificates.

    What it will prove, is whether the video is actually of a specific camera certificate. Not who owns the camera, if it has been swapped or if the video footage is real.



  • But how would one simple member of the audience easily determine if this whole chain of events is valid, when they don’t even get how it works or what to look out for?

    You’d have to have a public key of trusted sources that people automatically check with their browser, but all the steps in between need to be trusted too. I can imagine it is too much of a hassle for most.

    But then again, that has always been the case for most.









  • tweeks@feddit.nlto196@lemmy.blahaj.zonerobot rule
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    10 months ago

    It’s cutting my programming work in half right now with quality .NET code. As long as I stay in the lead and have good examples + context in my codebase, it saves me a lot of time.

    This was not the case for co-pilot though, but Cursor AI combined with Claude 3.7 is quite advanced.

    If people are not seeing any benefit, I think they have the wrong use cases, workflow or tools. Which can be fair limitations depending on your workplace of course.

    You could get in a nasty rabbit hole if you vibe-code too much though. Stay the architect and check generated code / files after creation.


  • tweeks@feddit.nltoPolitical Memes@lemmy.worldsurely
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Well, in many other systems you have an overarching ruling layer that sets laws and is able to enforce them from a top level.

    That is precisely the reason why those systems can be relatively stable. As you just have a very large group of people following the same set of rules.


  • tweeks@feddit.nltoPolitical Memes@lemmy.worldsurely
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    I like the idea of anarchism, but I see it as more of an ideal world view than an actual stable reality.

    To support this, every group member of every group must almost unanimously support the concept. When resources or safety in an area become scarce, it’s easy for some groups to evolve back into another power structure to take care of their own people.

    It’s really difficult for me to imagine everybody on this planet getting along with this. But I’m certainly interested in other viewpoints.