

wow that article is impossible to view. If it’s not a gigantic SWIPE FOR NEXT ARTICLE taking up half the page space it’s a goddamn video playing.


wow that article is impossible to view. If it’s not a gigantic SWIPE FOR NEXT ARTICLE taking up half the page space it’s a goddamn video playing.


Selfhoster on NixOS here too.
Nix (and operating services on a NixOS machine) is a learning curve, and even though tho project is over 10 years old now the semantic differences between the conventional approach to distro design/software development/ops is still a source of friction. But the project has come a long way and lots of popular software is packaged and hostable and just works (when you are aware of said semantic differences)
But when it works, and it often it does, it’s phenomenal and a very well integrated experience.
The problem in my exparience with using LLMs to assist is that the declarative nature of Nix makes them prone to hallucination: “Certainly, just go services.fooService.enable = true; in your configuraton.nix and you’re off to the races”. OTOH, because nix builds are hermetic and functional they’re pretty safe to include as a verification tool that something like Claude code can use to iterate on a solution.
There are some pretty good examples of selfhosting system configurations one can use as inspiration. I just discovered github.com/firecat53/nixos that is an excellent example of a modular system configuration that manages multiple machines, secrets, and self hosted services.
I pay for BitWarden, not so much because of any feature in their premium offering as that they are critical infrastructure for me and have acted consistently ethically. Also the annual Wikipedia and for a while Mozilla monthly. Way less than what I feel is deserving.
However, I have been working on building a social foss funding site where you set a total recurring donation amount which is then distributed by the Method of Equal Shares accordrding to weights you specify, ether manually or sourced from your os package manager.
Main benefits of that approach is that your budget is fixed, you can spread it over an arbitrary number of recipients, and priority is given to those that are more unique to you.
Would love to hear thoughts if anyone is interested. I hope to maybe test out an alpha version some time in 2026 if time permits.
Jeg ønsker mig bare at folk kunne finde fred med ikke at stresse over juleræset og fx gå en tur i stedet i frostklart vejr.
Men det var selvfølgelig før jeg hørte om bagestålet.


Thanks for this, solid recommendation!


God I love the EU for its consumer protections. Based. 🇪🇺
Let me tell you one thing: You’re doing alright.
Having your kids feel safe enough to be open like that and yourself sticking to listening and being there is probably the best anyone can hope for.


Urgh, and there’s a gofundme campaign that’s raised more than 40k already… and an “army of prayer warriors”…
Jesus fucking christ.


The main economically meaningful aspects of “retirement age” in Denmark AFAIK is that:
By far the most relevant of the two is the latter, as practically everyone is covered by pension schemes included in employment contracts.
As such you can still retire any time you want, but it will be more burdensome for you to it earlier than at the age sanctioned by law.


I just wish we could collectively realize the whole enterprise is epistemologically bankrupt.
It is okay to stop trying to apply reason once you have encountered the first unreconcilable contradiction.


I’d vote to ship as many eggs as the market can bear. With the proviso that each egg comes painted with the face of Donald Trump and an “information” pamphlet…


Same. Wishful thinking I suppose.


You’re right - it isn’t. I’m tired too, so only put it in the alt text that it’s a snapchat filter 🤦♂️.


Is it because a trained AI is used for profit?
Absolutely. But especially because it skews the market dynamic. Copyright doesn’t exist for moral reasons but financial reasons.


Is that a promise?

And right you are OP. I’ve thought the X had some resemblance to a swastika but this is the first time I’ve seen someone actually realizing it graphically.
Schadenfreude intensifies


Being a 3-dimensional being I was only able to make sense of this by imagining what a 3D puzzle piece would look like.
This is of course a lie to make myself sound clever… it was the buttplug analogy that made it all snap into place for me.
Hmm isn’t that a somewhat paradoxical take?
If the proposed solution is to pin your idea of what is safe on a rigorously formalised security policy, doesn’t that entail that you know what you’re doing (i.e. your problem domain is sufficiently narrow that you are capable of comprehending it fully) and isn’t that exactly not the case with most/all(?) applications that benefit from AI?
Didn’t read the complete article, so mea culpa, but some examples of systems where this is feasible would be welcome.
It certainly doesn’t seem feasible for my goto example of software development using claude code.