So you want that community to change because you don’t like it.

It looks everyone else is fine with it. So you got two options: block it on your end, and / or make your own the way you want.

I understand this is not what you expected, but just because you don’t like something doesn’t mean it needs to change just for you.

Btw there’s a reason that people don’t like to hear often: we do not have reddit numbers, and therefore if you do not allow reposts from reddit, a lot of communities would be basically dead.

Pretty sure they used a master ball to catch him and he is weak to ground type attacks.

Oh hey it’s got the mexico filter

“are you sure you don’t want any food?”

Maybe too many eggs in one basket

That’s fine, and maybe they will do it even more justice. It’s art, and if these small assets are where your game shines, then it’s probably better anyway to do all these assets from scratch. But if you wanna put your time and creativity somewhere else, you are able to efficiently complete those tasks and get to the part that you feel is most important for you game. And you will have more time to invest. And I think that makes art design and game development more fun.

I mean for me it’s always a thing of real players seeing it. So if you make it public with AI art, then it’s made with AI art, because part of the enjoyment people feel might come from an asset or texture that’s not made by an artist.

If you replace everything before publishing it, I think it’s just part of the development cycle and no user will ever see it, and then it’s fine.

I mean he did go off the deep end but it seems he’s taking a different route now.

And to add to this, configuring your server has nothing to do with the source code.

I think banning specific communities unrelated to illegal activity is bad, but this is not hard coding according to consensus definitions.

Honestly it’s probably nice to have an AI generate “basic_bench_53”. And like everything else with AI, this won’t replace art design, but it will help them accelerate some menial and boring tasks.

And that’s exactly what AI is good for: make the boring stuff faster, so you can invest your time into the important and fulfilling parts of your job.

Für mich mega nützlich wenn ich größere Skripts schreibe und mit undokumentierten tools oder Schnittstellen zum ersten Mal arbeite.

LLMs sind halt schlechter als Dokumentationen, aber besser brute force wenn du nicht was wie etwas funktioniert.

You know what? Actually yes. This looks awesome.

Ich glaube eher 50% versteht’s und is pissed, und 40% versteht das nicht, und 10% nimmt es billigend in Kauf.

Because he specifically argued in his divorce that he suffers cognitive impairment and therefore he projects less future earnings. So he himself basically argued he is not smart enough to earn even as much as the average guy.

So in his own words, he has a cognitive impairment that will not go away. Now either you trust his advice (which assumes it’s good advice, and kinda goes against him saying under oath he will have cognitive impairment) or you think he was saying the truth under oath and now his advice is not worth too much.

Basically you have to decide which version of his you wanna trust. And if I have to decide between “he is dumb” or “he lied under oath”, I know one thing for sure - and that is to be very skeptical of anything he says.

Alle Jahre wieder wird das Recht auf Privatsphäre belächelt.

The d is silent

https://tracreports.org/phptools/immigration/remove/

This tracks. According to this data the percentage of removal enforcements for people without conviction [imo wrongfully deported] climbed from around 35% to 75% between 2021 and 2024.

To put it plainly: in 2024 ICE deported 75% for nothing. Just vibes. And this is specifically ICE, any other agency has been excluded from these numbers.

In fact if you look at the numbers by month and year, we get a percentage of 33.3% for Feb 2021 and 74.9% for Feb 2024 for the same category.

The ethical boundaries changed. ICE is getting direct instructions to grab anyone who looks suspicious just so they can meet their quota. Currently they are composed of a ragtag team of new hires and people pulled from other agencies with a mind-boggling budget and insane pressure to meet numbers that are unreachable. They are being pressure cooked by their command chain and in that environment of course empathetic people will just sign out and people with an agenda or psychopaths will stay. So the direct command is to focus not only on people with criminal history (which even back then meant people with traffic offenses and other minor violations) but also now people with no criminal record at all, which puts the whole purpose of this agency into question and kind of rips this agency away from it’s core structure and goals.

For a more fulsome picture of the agency, watch this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aDbtrdfYqBc

John Harris shines a light on the change in agency culture and structure by using a list of different sources and data to show their current tasks and goals.

I think they’re saying it’s less effective in the short term but extremely effective in the long term and kind of a new magnitude of censorship.

It hurts not in a homicide way, but in a strategical and structurally depraved way.

This

Yes, it’s not enough and it’s fine to acknowledge that, but when people do good it’s also just as important to acknowledge that as well.

We can speculate about motive but that day he did something good. That doesn’t fix everything, but it’s good and I like that.

Surprising that you caught your owner on selfie as well :)