Smol girlthing from the deepest trenches of the sea.

My profile picture is a gif animation of a green alien cat Glorp who’s driving at night.

My profile banner is a cropped image of the main menu screen from Beneath Apple Manor, a pre-Rogue roguelike written for the Apple II in 1978.

My Piefed alt: @catfeeder@piefed.blahaj.zone.

  • 91 Posts
  • 182 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: August 6th, 2024

help-circle
  • Several questionable features like “reputation” (basically karma) were added in PieFed on a opt-out basis creating lots of drama. Rimu (the main developer of the project) reacted poorly to this. Then he also got into another drama related to one of .world admins and got attention of the tankies. He ended up creating a built-in banlist of people who offended him, to his instance - except that it doubles as the flagship PieFed instance so it was widely seen as a bad move.

    The most recent drama was related to the ‘vote limit’ based on a observation that a small percent of people on threadiverse cast most votes on posts. He (somehow) thought it meant these people control what everyone sees so he ended up adding a limit on how many posts and comments each user can vote. It doesn’t affect most users but some very active users were really upset over it.

    There are posts on c/fediverse@lemmy.world on all these events if you want to know more about them.



  • Dark Souls I (but no Dark Souls II, I’m not sure about the third) doesn’t engage your completionism that much. Although you would need to avoid online guides and wikis as well as Steam/PS/Xbox. The letter will generally be the case for all mentioned games.

    Yume Nikki is a… weird “game”. More like experience honestly. The whole gameplay is taking a walk in dreamworlds and collect “effects”. There’s nothing beyond that really. Don’t read up on “events” on the wiki though.

    Outer Wilds is another game with a focus on exploring and solving a great mystery. No collectibles, no optional challenges, no permanently skipable content.

    NO-SKIN is pretty straightforward too.















  • Why do we need to base it on something?

    Humans like naming things after other things. Like how we name people after concepts we like (love, hope, faith, etc).

    He vs. she is already not that useful of a distinction anyway.

    I agree.

    We don’t gender any other pronouns, hasn’t ever been an issue.

    Well, first-person pronouns don’t really need any distinguishing since it can only mean one person/group. Second-person pronouns are generally favored by context so they can be non-specific. But third-person pronouns can mean literally any person (including the speaker and the listener) so some way to limit who that ‘them’ might be is useful. At least, that’s my experience from writing notes about a society with no gender - I got really tired of endless ‘thems’ so I started using two sets of neopronouns.



  • A distinction based on age. Different pronouns for children, adults, elderly or relative to the speaker’s age.

    That’s the one I thought about after posting.

    A distinction based on status and respect. A bit similar to what Japanese does with honorific name suffixes but in pronoun form.

    It could actually be the evolved version of the age-based pronouns. The pronouns for older people become the pronouns for respectable individuals and stuff like that.

    A distinction based on proximity. One set of pronouns for a person near the speaker, one for a person near the listener and one for a person somewhere else. Japanese does something similar for things (これ kore, それ sore, あれ are) but as far as I know, not for people.

    A distinction based on familiarity. One set of pronouns to refer to close friends and family, one for acquaintances, one for strangers.

    I like these weirdly practical pronouns! I can imagine them in a language of a highly rational alien species.

    One of the conlangs I’m occasionally working on has pronouns based on the shortened form of names: the first syllable of the person’s name plus a suffix. Plus one set of pronouns for if you don’t know (or don’t want to mention) a person’s name.

    I’d argue that shortened names aren’t pronouns. Like, “Bob” isn’t a pronoun after all. But that’s a cool idea nonetheless.