• 0 Posts
  • 65 Comments
Joined vor 6 Monaten
cake
Cake day: 10. Januar 2026

help-circle



  • dantel@programming.devtome_irl@lemmy.worldMe_irl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    vor 9 Tagen

    Lol. We can sustain and oversupply right now BECAUSE people do their jobs. This becomes absolutely impossible if people just stopped. Do you even have the slightest idea how many people have to do their job in order to build the simplest of machinery needed for modern farming?

    Who is building the machines and equipment needed for that? Ok, just for fun - let’s imagine someone still does that in your world without jobs, why would they just give it to you or someone else? In exchange for some bones and pretty stones you’ve found in your backyard? What can you possibly provide that’s worth even a fucking tractor? This is so delusional I have really no words for it.

    If you think it’s so easy and great then go get your like-minded buddies and just do it. What’s stopping you? Nobody will care if you play somewhere out in the wilderness.


  • dantel@programming.devtome_irl@lemmy.worldMe_irl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    vor 9 Tagen

    Ok listen, we’re 8.3 billion people on this world. If everyone goes back to growing and gathering their own food, there is no fucking way you can sustain this population. There is not enough land for everyone to grow their food. There is not enough food to gather if everyone depends on it. There will be a massive fight over resources, where a very small subset will come out on top, a massive amount of people just die and then a good portion of people who will try to survive by serving the winning group.

    And no matter where you land, IF you even happen to be the lucky one who survived, you have enough land nobody is strong enough to take from you and you happen to resources in your area you can gather, doing that will be a full time job, massively labor intensive. No matter if your ‘regard’ this a job or not.

    BTW. You can live your dream of gathering your own food right now. It’s called being homeless. Knock yourself out.



  • dantel@programming.devtome_irl@lemmy.worldMe_irl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    vor 10 Tagen

    The point is people died very frequently and in no way could we sustain the current population if we went back to those practices. Even if some people got older, a tribe needs a huge surplus of young people to survive. And everyone had to pull their weight one way or another. If people stopped working today, most would absolutely die off and that’s it. It is beyond me how some seem to think it would be some kind of paradise where everyone has everything they need. Delusional.


  • dantel@programming.devtome_irl@lemmy.worldMe_irl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    vor 10 Tagen

    This is a romantic view on that. In reality, ‘old’ meant 30 years old and then people died pretty soon. There were no real old people. And the very young also died left and right, that’s why women had to throw out one child after another just so the tribe wouldn’t go extinct.



  • dantel@programming.devtome_irl@lemmy.worldMe_irl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    vor 10 Tagen

    You seem to have absolutely no idea how many people just died away in those times. You need food and health care, nobody will just give that to you. It will be survival of the fittest again, much more extreme then what we have today.

    You seem to assume that everybody will have enough of everything and we all live in happyness and joy, only doing what you love.

    That’s of course BS. You will be fighting for your survival and chances are you’ll lose that fight. Only thanks to our civilization it is possible at all to sustain that many people.







  • Thank you, exactly what I was gonna say. How many teams have elite security experts? That number is not 0 but very close. That is fantastic news and I’m 100% going to use that tool when it comes out. It being less almighty actually makes it easier to release and actually helps improving security in practice, as otherwise it might have been heavily restricted or not open to the public at all.



  • I hate to admit it, but I do work with Oracle Apex quite a bit. 15 years of experience to be precise. I’ve created several big applications with it which are running in production right now.

    And still, if I had the choice I’d avoid it like the plague. This is 100% vendor lock in with very little benefit.

    The only reason I’m using it is because it was already in use when I came into the picture and there was some know how in the team already. But guess what, those people left and now I’m the only one who really knows what’s going on and has meaningful knowledge and experience in PLSQL, which you absolutely need if you want to create anything non trivial with Apex.

    And of course finding people who actually know PLSQL at the level required to maintain those systems is very’hard. Who is going to learn an archaic procedural language which will only ever work within an Oracle database? Nobody within their right mind.

    We tried introducing several rookies into this - all of them run away.

    Another big reason to avoid it is that if you ever have the need to do something which is outside of what the generator accounts for, you will be fighting the framework constantly to still make it work and pray to the gods that no Apex update will break whatever you had to hack in.

    There is really no reason any sane company should introduce this. It is not cheap. It is not easy outside of trivial things. The vendor lock in is huge.

    Avoid!