I don’t get it.

sure some are formal

yeah. that would be some. now compare those three to the rest of the cast

but doesn’t the twilight implementation sorta give you a bunch of counter points from your original argument?

like sure some of them are formal, but it’s definitely not solely the 1800s aesthetic you had an issue with.

no its fine, they changed it with amendments. surely over the years they’ve had a bunch of changes

only 27 amendments

the 18th and 21st amendments just cancel each other out

the most recent amendment was 34 years ago, and was proposed in 1789

yep, amendments are keeping up with the times

that’s fairly true, preying on weakness and all that. I guess I shouldve angled the question a bit different.

is there any form of gambling that isn’t scummy? I don’t think gambling is inherently exploitative, personally.

I don’t mean anything by this question, but do you see any casino as a scumbag company too? or is there a difference in how valve is operating that puts them in that category?

I don’t feel like I have a strong answer to that, other than there is a standard deduction applied to all federal tax returns. I suppose this would effectively give you the “tax free” bracket?

careful, they might pull an android and somehow try and stop “sideloading” in windows

just to be a voice of dissidence, not all data centers fuel AI, and they’re certainly vital to a vast amount of the internet.

the heck is that body-sized blue fish-hook thing

don’t worry random-internet-person, I just graded your answer and found that you were correct and that other person grading you was wrong.

so you know, you can move on now?

you’re not wrong on every point. but the unfortunate addendum is that the essentials are also too expensive.

Is that something that her husband has been known to do? Admittedly, I don’t know much about Noem, nor her husband, but I didn’t think he was the one making this a hypocritical situation.

an appropriate combination of cute and creep

you guys get days like the second panel?

I don’t love that the headline as well as the first line of the article use the words “says” and “claims”.

the jury ruled he was guilty. we’re so far past “allegedly” and all that garbage. he did it. she was drugged. she was raped. there is no reason to be inferring any amount of doubt anymore.

not sure if you were being serious or something, but that’s straight incorrect.

https://www.etymonline.com/word/ranger

the one that makes me irrationally angry is the used car dealership advertising. like the decals are annoying, but the license plate covers/border things that people don’t take off.

like do you really want to be advertising chuck and donna’s used car emporium every time you drive your car?

if you make a π but then don’t do the | then you get τ

I don’t understand what the pig intestines have to do with this.

are you saying it’s a staged photo using pig intestine as the gore, or that they somehow impaled themselves with it?