The door, frame, and handle are usually sold separately. You can grab them at any regular hardware store.

Leave a 10 mm gap all around between the rough opening and the door frame, then adjust it plumb and level using a drill and a long bubble level - or ideally a laser if you’ve got one.

Anyone can do it if they just know how, and YouTube is full of solid tutorials.

Too much is always enough

I’m not sure what you mean. The “arch” is attatched to brick with 14 long screws.

Did myself dirty by accidentally buying too narrow a door frame - which is why it didn’t sit flush with the wall on this side, making the trim install a bit tricky. Luckily I’ve dealt with the same issue before, so it came out alright.

Nobody knows what it actually takes to reach AGI, so nobody knows whether a certain system has enough compute and context size to get there.

For all we know, it could turn out way simpler than anyone thought - or the exact opposite.

My point still stands: you (or Cameron) couldn’t possibly know with absolute certainty.

I’d have zero issue with the claim if you’d included even a shred of humility and acknowledged you might be wrong. You made an absolute statement instead. That I disagree with.

I haven’t been excited about a new smartphone since LG V20. What ever is “new” in our current flagships doesn’t really interest me that much.

It’s a bit vague article anyway. It doesn’t really specify what they banned exactly. I doubt that they’ll just go with tire width alone. I know what kind of bikes they’re talking about and those are nothing like my eBike despite having fat tires too. The pedals on mine aren’t for show.

ChatGPT is the sole reason I was able to switch from Windows to Linux. It walked me through the installation process and has helped me troubleshoot every issue I’ve had.

It’s perfectly valid to discuss the dangers of AGI whether LLMs are the path there or not. I’ve been concerned about AGI and ASI for far longer than I’ve even known about LLMs, and people were worried about exactly the same stuff back then as they are now.

This is precisely the kind of threat you should try to find a solution for before we actually reach AGI - because once we do, it’s way, way too late.

Also:

There is factually 0 chance we’ll reach AGI with the current brand of technology.

You couldn’t possibly know that with absolute certainty.

The headline talks about “sending jets into Canadian airspace” as if US jets don’t already routinely fly there.

If anyone who wasn’t the head of an LLM company spouted this drivel, they’d be locked away in a padded room and Axios would rightly be called out for exacerbating the mental health crisis of a paranoid schizophrenic.

Like Eliezer Yudkowsky, Roman Yampolskiy, Stuart Russell, Nick Bostrom, Yoshua Bengio, Geoffrey Hinton, Max Tegmark and Toby Ord?

This comes across more as a warning than a sales pitch.

If only I could convince myself to be as dismissive about the threats of AGI as the average user here seems to be…

The headline is sensationalized and misleading. The U.S. ambassador did not threaten to “send fighter jets into Canadian airspace” as a hostile or coercive act. What he actually said was:

If Canada backs out of or significantly reduces the F-35 purchase, the U.S. would need to adjust NORAD arrangements because Canada would no longer contribute equivalent capability to continental air defense. This could mean the U.S. buying additional F-35s to cover the gap and potentially conducting more routine patrols or intercepts in Canadian airspace to maintain the same level of shared security.

It’s not a problem - that’s literally the practice. You focus on something like your breath, and every time you catch yourself getting lost in thought, you just gently go back to the breath.

The overwhelming majority of people couldn’t stop their thoughts for even 10 seconds if their life depended on it. And they don’t have to. Just notice the thoughts and start again.

You can even meditate on the thought itself - it doesn’t have to be the breath.

Assuming you’re talking about presidential elections - no one. The next elections are in 2030, not 2028.

I’ve been happy with Stubb so I’ll probably vote for him even though I voted for Haavisto last time.

A little context would be in place. I have no idea what you’re even talking about.

Appreciate it.

I’m not at all surprised who the OP here was.

How dare you not upvote my post.

Voting in itself isn’t necessarily the issue. It’s users being able to see those scores that feeds the echo chamber.

It affects posting and commenting habits because people quickly learn what’s popular and what isn’t. That leads to both self-censorship and just shouting out popular views for validation without putting much critical thought into it.

It also primes users to approach posts or comments with a strong bias - positive or negative - based on the up- or downvote count before they’ve even read a word.