

One of the reasons they got through with it is that the big three already has it, so I guess… Update and read the documentation of your compiler of choice?


One of the reasons they got through with it is that the big three already has it, so I guess… Update and read the documentation of your compiler of choice?


I can live without Logseq but for work and keeping a log of how that worked (other than bash history) It’s really useful
Good question. My response would be: only where it is not used as an enum.
The example in the article is one example (although I’ve never seen that idiom in the wild) or for doing things like bitfields (the opposite of the to_underlying section).


I’m quite the opposite, I really dislike them having to ship my code off to another server (especiallly since that might be in the US or Russia). When they haven’t even bothered with integrating the cppreference / qt docs (yes I’m on CLion, they have it as well) an AI is not what I’m looking for.


You are missing the best one. If you want to make great GUIs there really is no substitute for Qt with Qt Creator. Nice GUI editor as you are used to in VS, C++ with the best documentation I’ve seen in anything open source. Qt was the GUI toolkit that got me hooked on C++ back in the day. (https://www.qt.io/download) Be aware there is a commercial and an open source version but you can relatively easily get the open source one from the online installer.
What you are looking for must be Copperspice: https://www.copperspice.com/ It checks all your boxes, since it is a hard fork of Qt, but doesn’t use the moc and only an open source licence. Since you haven’t even tried to explain why you won’t use Qt, it is a little difficult to help with an alternative.
That being said, it really sounds like what you are looking for is Qt 🤷