Billionaires and millionaires are on opposite sides? Now there’s a twist.

That sounds like the fortune teller’s equivalent of “I’m not a doctor but I play one on TV” or “Bill Nye is a science entertainer, not an actual science guy”.

Unless it’s a scam (which was the rationale behind the law; to its credit, I am quite satisfied there aren’t more Sylvia Browns).

One who was worried about scams.

Raccoons, especially in Seattle, are not typical prey for coyotes.

Would’ve been cool to hear that quote in the Odyssey.

Scientists commenting on Jimothy have said before that there’s nothing in his condition that presents a setback in survival.

If anything, the coffee was a stand-in for the pork, not the class/people. It holds the same place in this sense for some people. You didn’t know that?

If anything, I’m only trying to understand.

Where does one draw the line between spite, harassment, happenstance, and normal activities? If I followed a tradition that didn’t allow me to have dogs as pets, and someone chose to walk their dog down my street, by whose logic is it a hate crime? Never mind the fact that conventional wisdom is it must be a crime first before it can combine with other factors to become a hate crime.

How so?

Nothing was even sent though.

Yeah, but leaving food in certain spots? That’s deep application there knowing what is known about American law.

My traditions technically say I shouldn’t drink coffee. Suppose someone was in the mood, so out of “spite” (if that’s the word to use), they said “here, build that new Starbucks right next to her house”. It’s due to this depth of application that I imagine I could sue the Starbucks.

I remember back when the Westboro Baptists were at their peak and someone pulled off the highly amusing move of buying a home across the street from them and painting it with the LGBT flag colors. To give a scope of that, implied in the bacon incident is that wouldn’t be possible.

The amazement is about what little went into the bacon incident.

I think what he’s asking is “why move arms at all?”

I think what he’s asking is “why move arms at all?”

deleted by creator

One that’s in English.

Removed by mod

That moment when you realize this is a trick question.

No. Have you? There’s something concerning here if the spotlight in the conversation is on someone thinking there’s no difference between subjectively being unable to understand something and something being objectively difficult to understand.