deleted by creator
- 0 Posts
- 16 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
Cake day: August 29th, 2023
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
3·1 year agoWith enough quantum tunneling, anything is possible!
“Blows up blender with mind”
I personally finished “Inside” in one sitting without planning to.
Phrasing…
23·1 year agoI want to argue with this, but it makes too much sense
I am hilarious and you will quote everything I say
I see eye of newt, but where, prithee, is your…
sQuIrT oF lEmOn? 🍋🟩🤏
107·1 year agoNo, it’s Javascript, keep up
The topology enthusiast says the jug is full of glass
CSS is decorating a christmas tree off to the side. Some of the decorations are hovering in the air. We don’t correct CSS, as it seems to be having fun regardless.
1·3 years agoIs it because of the “Host” HTTP header? I always thought it was optional, since the IP address and port were handled by the network and transport layers respectively. Turns out it’s required to resolve between different virtual hosts in the same server. Today I Remembered (TIR?) that virtual hosts are a thing…
Is there anything else that might indicate the domain name in the handshake connection?
I don’t get it… How does this protect anything? If we want our packets to reach a web server, we need to write the server’s IP address on them. If a snooper has the IP, can’t they just lookup the domain name from a DNS server? Or is that not a service DNS provides?
If the IP address is encrypted, how will the routers know where to send the packets? Only solution I can think of would be onion routing… Am I wrong??
10·3 years agoThat’s right, baby! GAME AH DAH YEEAAAR!
11·3 years agoIf you’re having fun after 1600 hours, then you’re not playing it wrong
This makes me wonder… If there really is someone automating these reports, how did they not forsee the potencial for reporting completely harmless commits? It’s like this was caused by someone who just recently got into the world of software and scripting and thought they were good enough to help with the security for decades-old software.
Was it intentional and - if so - what would they benefit from this??
" - is not what the cat said
They meant “single basket”. It’s not a good idea to mix your password manager with your 2FA. It might only take 1 breach in 1 service for your accounts to be unlocked by malicious actors, instead of 2 breaches in 2 separate services.