It’s hella rude when touching stuff like doorknobs after

…? Why is that a standard if it’s not the case for petroleum fuels either?

Economic viability is extremely significant. It “just” becoming more expensive is often enough to kill it in favor of more viable alternatives.

Synthesizing CH-Chains from air is painfully energy-inefficient. Now that we have good electric motors its smarter to use that energy to power them directly.

The poor parts of the world with lacking electrical infrastructure who also couldn’t afford ““e-fuels”” to replace gasoline would have a pretty hard transition.

Unemployment in our (EU) IT sector is higher than in the US and rising… What are you talking about?

You are talking about something else. Show me.

People are morons. Here we have an open source and anonymous framework for age-verifcation (free for anyone to read and check the source code: https://ageverification.dev/) developed by a people’s institution and people lump it into the same boat as some private USA company photocopying your ID.

No? What are you even talking about dude? You’re on a different topic

Leak what? Nobody at any point stores any documents and you would know that if any of you read the OPEN SOURCE framework the EU developed.

https://ageverification.dev/

https://ageverification.dev/

The framework is anonymous and open source.

Did you at any point actually read the open-source, anonymous age-verfication framework to be used by the EU?

https://ageverification.dev/

That means Brioche is also not considered bread in Ireland.

Bit meaningless this whole thing. Go to France and everything is considered bread.

I see what you did there

I think the whole stove’s on fire tbh

Both can be true. Grindr’s statement doesn’t disprove this claim and is in fact compatible.

Risking “a” proposed park is a drop in the bucket in the face of how easily this system can be abused. There are no provisions from making logging claims without any intention of actually logging and thereby claiming “fake” carbon credits.

The damage this does, including severe risks of potential wildfires destroying said park, dramatically outweighs the benefit of one singular park.

Half-blind 80 year olds on e-bikes scare me much more than some youth doing wheelies

Ultimately yes. People easily get confused between power density (power per volume), energy density(energy per volume), specific energy(energy per mass unit) and specific power(power per mass unit)

Didn’t we literally just establish that the power density is higher than Li-Ion?

How is “Don’t be lazy and procrastinate” a cheat code…?

About as dumb as “just buy a house” if you’re homeless.