That’s not a constitutional way of states removing themselves from the federal government; that’s a constitutional way to amend the constitution.
Is it constitutional to amend the constitution? Then how is that not a constitutional way?
Quick question, who was in the wrong on January 6th, 2021?
Wow, what is this? You checking my papers to see if you’re allowed to continue the conversation?
Who was wrong, Trump, DC police, capital police, the protestors that went passed the barriers, certainly every protestor that agressed towards police; and following that, the Biden administration for the way they handled 95% of the prosecution against said protestors.
if ISIS came into your town and started killing your neighbors, would you be encouraging everybody to just lay low?
I don’t think the analogy works. ISIS isn’t a legitimate federal law enforcement agency enforcing federal law. If my neighbor went to Iran and got shot by ISIS while protesting, I would think he’s an absolute idiot; but at the same time I would wish it hadn’t happened. If my neighbor illegally entered Iran or overstayed a visa and was rounded up by ISIS and then imprisoned before being deported; I would also think, wow what an absolite idiot, I wish he hadn’t done that; but that’s a very normal occurance for immigration crime worldwide.
you’re just a fascist.
That word doesn’t mean anything anymore, you’ve run it into the ground.
To be clear, I’m not saying he was in the wrong in any way for being armed.
I haven’t really heard much about this situation. I’ve seen some videos and it seems incredibly sketch at the very least. It doesn’t appear that he did anything wrong and he was within his rights to be there and was carrying lawfully.
However that being said… You’re perfectly within your rights to confront an angry bull that’s rampaging through your living room; but when you get gored people will ask why you put yourself in that situation.
There are no innocents in this situation. Both sides are making bad choice and escalating at every chance they get. Trump could have pulled ICE out and levied sanctions on Minnesota. Waltz could have told everyone to go home, that the fight is not on the streets. ICE could have chose to not shoot. Good could have not obstructed. No one here is making good choices because backing down in the heat of the moment is construed as weakness.
Everyone needs cooling down, if mother was in charge everyone would be getting a spanking.
Well I find it concerning because I really would love a new Star Trek that’s on the level of TNG, or Voyager, or DS9.
Ultimately does it effect me? Nope, but it’s disappointing when producers feel that such a departure is a good thing or even necessary to stay relevant with the times; when in reality those changes make the entire show irrelevant.
, it is a sober recount of the facts of the situation we’re currently in.
It’s not sober at all, it’s an incredibly recent, heated, emotional take as per usual on these hyper political issues.
The emotional charge is more responsibility for these terrible occurances than policy or enforcement.
These are armed, masked government goons slaughtering civilians in the streets in a widespread terror campaign orchestrated by your criminal warlord president wherein various people labeled “undesirables” by your fascist government are disappeared to concentration camps and “deported” to prisons in other countries they have no connection to.
10/10 exaggeration of the circumstances; and the situations you’re describing are being exasperated by the population illegal obstructing legal law enforcement operations. You’re making it sound like Vlad the Impaler raised Hitler and his Nazi army from the dead and they’re roaming the streets eating liberal babies.
Again, your time to fight the government is in the courts. If you want change, fight them in the courts. If you want violence and conflict then keep up the obstruction.
I may agree with you if over the past 5 years the term “fascist” hadn’t been deluted more than a dive bar’s $0.50 draft beer.
You’re saying that any rejoinder offered to any criticism that might have been levied to by a right winger is de facto an accusation of review bombing and an assertion of the show’s popularity in spite of such?
No. I’m not saying that.
Oh, well next time you’re wrong by someone and dont immediately get justice; you’re absolutely justified jumping to violence… /s
Troll = Doesn’t agree with your policial takes; brilliant.
A convention of states to amend the constitution; explicitly saying that specific state is no longer apart of the U.S., or inserting another legal route of succession into the constitution.
Much easier, and at the same time much more difficult than civil war.
So all the people supporting this guy are changing their tune on Kyle Rittenhouse showing up armed to defend his community, right?
Right?
Oh yeah; I’m feeling all the cognitive disidence downvotes flowing in.
The video OP posted was talking about specific nonsense positions put forward by specific nonsense people.
Which might not be stated but I feel is a defensive response to the negative reviews.
Is this video about MAGA response?
Are the negative reviews most likely from MAGA style viewers?
Yes? Then the two are absolutely connected.
You seem very concerned with how popular this show is.
I’ve answered this multiple times. Low viewship and high review bombs clearly indicate a disconnect between production and what’s expected by the audience. Sure they can produce whatever they want, but if Ford Motors starts producing coffee, then don’t be surprised when their customer base says “WTF, we don’t want this, we never asked for this”.
Viagra will kill the shit out of you if you have a heart attack and the emergency room gives you nitroglycerin.
Well. Maybe you don’t die, but it won’t have the intended effect.
Now show me a map of Somalia after it’s no longer subsidized by Minnesota.
National divorse is in no way a euphemism for civil war. There’s literally a constitutional way of states removing themselves from the Federal Government, that’s what national divorse means.
There’s a third option: people don’t resist and
the regime does whatever it wants.we fight them in the court
Glad I could fix that for you.
why hide behind numbers at all?
Oh, okay let’s keep spending millions per episode so a few thousand people can enjoy the show. That’s absolutely how show business works.
Numbers are critical and a key indicator of mainstream success.
As I’ve stated multiple times already low viewer count combined with high review bombs indicates a disconnect between what’s being produced and what the audience wants.
I don’t understand this at all. They’re enforcing federal immigration law; and in the situations where theyre interacting with citizens like Good; it’s due to the citizens violating federal law by obstructing their actions; and they absolutely have the authority to detain and arrest people who obstruct their duties.
Oh I support Minnesota’s right to protest; however your right to protest does not extend to obstructing official duties of a law enforcement officer. If your protest strategy is flash mobs that intimidate and make the job of working officers more difficult then that protest is not a protected right under the first amendment.
Smart, but also easily bypassed by anyone whose determined to do so; so maybe it’s kind of useless.
Most experts would say that it’s too soon to make judgements about the shooting. There’s more information coming out every minute. I would love to see an independent investigation, but we all know that won’t happen. But yes it seems really botched, really messed up; but back to what I said earlier, there are many many people to blame here. If the shooting was unjustified then absolutely the shooter will carry most of the blame, but everyone is at fault here.