return2ozma@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 年前Biden signs bill criticized as “major expansion of warrantless surveillance”arstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square88linkfedilinkarrow-up1485arrow-down122cross-posted to: technology@lemmit.onlinetechnology@lemmy.zippolitics@lemmy.worldtechnology@hexbear.net
arrow-up1463arrow-down1external-linkBiden signs bill criticized as “major expansion of warrantless surveillance”arstechnica.comreturn2ozma@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 年前message-square88linkfedilinkcross-posted to: technology@lemmit.onlinetechnology@lemmy.zippolitics@lemmy.worldtechnology@hexbear.net
minus-squarephoneymouse@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up26·2 年前How is this even constitutional. Does the 4th amendment even exist?
minus-squareCar@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 年前The government is defining this to be reasonable search. Crisis averted! Please scan your iris on the way out of this thread.
minus-squarefar_university1990@feddit.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·2 年前Spying on the government Edit: politician to be more exact
minus-squaremelpomenesclevage@lemm.eeBannedlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down7·2 年前Removed by mod
How is this even constitutional. Does the 4th amendment even exist?
Only if you’re rich enough.
The government is defining this to be reasonable search. Crisis averted! Please scan your iris on the way out of this thread.
What is unreasonable then?
Spying on the government
Edit: politician to be more exact
Removed by mod