• Cuttlersan@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    6 months ago

    Exorbitant increases in electricity costs, environmental damage and rampant water usage, and the fact that the data center is almost certainly going to be used for “AI” and not internet providers. Believe it or not, Michigan already has access to the internet!

    • ramble81@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      Where do you think the internet is served from? Generally Datacenters. You talk about environmental impact but don’t want it in your state, which is ultimate NIMBY’ism. So I’m curious, where should Datacenters be, since you’ll still benefit from them?

      • Five@slrpnk.netOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        There are still hundreds of miles of dark fiber in city centers. Server racks in cities are not full, and are instead being emptied despite the fact that it costs more to host data in places like rural Michigan. Servers hosted in urban settings have lower latency due to their proximity to primary network nodes, and have higher performance and uptime due to the concentration of talent and experience in urban settings.

        Giant data centers planned in smaller communities are motivated by one thing - a swapped power relationship between the community and the corporation. The ability to ‘externalize’ many of the higher costs of hosting data remotely to the people living in these smaller communities is the profit motive behind their construction.