• Dr. Bob@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    150
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I grew up in the 1970s. We were eating candy cigarettes. 😄

  • foggy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    71
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Bro 90s sweets?

    Gushers

    String thing

    Dunkaroos

    Choco tacos

    Squeezits

    Fruit by the foot

    Fruit rollups.

    If you know anyone in their late 30s to early 40s, be surprised they have teeth.

  • NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    67
    ·
    1 year ago

    Of course we didn’t have iPhones then. We had a pet in a small box and it died if you didn’t press the buttons the right number of times every day.

  • Coldgoron@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    64
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ah yes I remember the sound of dial up modems and churning butter like yesterday.

      • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        We put ours in a jar and then passed around in a circle taking turns shaking the jar until butter was willed into existence.

        Same classroom had a Macintosh 2 in it that we were absolutely not allowed to touch.

        • 5redie8@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          One time drurng a slow day at Starbucks we managed to churn the sweet cream in to butter using one of the blenders so I guess I’m in on this too

      • GoodLuckToFriends@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Hey! Samesy experience! I don’t remember how that lesson came up, but we definitely had an entire afternoon dedicated to shaking the jars. I think it was after learning how to read clocks and before the summer break.

  • Dr_Box@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 year ago

    Does putting a jumbo marshmellow on a saltine cracker and nuking it for 15 seconds in the microwave count as a baked sweet?

    • glimse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Ah, that’s a good point. 1898 makes a lot more sense for baking your own sweets.

      The 1990s was a big decade for processed foods

      • MDCCCLV@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        You still had a lot of older women making and canning their own stuff, in older 60s or 70s pots like that. It just wasn’t as common and things were trending away from that

      • verity_kindle@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        In 1898, you could order giant boxes of cheap candy and chocolates, colored and flavored with all kinds of industrial byproducts. Nothing was off the table. “Artificial” is semantic, they just called it “glucose” instead of “corn syrup”. Source: 1898 Sears, Roebuck & Co. catalog. I also read up on contemporary recipes for commercial candy making.

        • glimse@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I feel like when most people think of 1990s food, they’re (accurately) picturing brightly-colored snacks and candy.

          I’m also inclined to think that kids today are VERY aware of the 80s due to the popularity of the aesthetic and it feels weird that someone would assume we went “backwards” with candy like that

          None of this is certain, of course. They could just be reminiscing about a time as a kid when they made candy with their family, too!

  • Lord Wiggle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 year ago

    Bitch, I spent hours on illegally copying a disc of age of empires I borrowed from a class mate. I didn’t even have a walkman anymore (I do now, ironically)

  • Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    Excuse me while I go crumble into dust and blow away.

    Also, holy shit, at least where I was the late 90s were peak “low fat” (high sugar) product times, there was SO much sweet garbage to buy. If anything more than there is now, because now there’s the mindset among most people that we should probably cut back on sweets.

  • missandry351@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 Oh yes I was born in 1990 those good old days where there were no cars, no electricity, no plumbing, no vaccines, people weren’t going to school ah yes the good old days

  • barneypiccolo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    I often refer to 2000 as the turn of the century, and it causes confusion among old people. I’m old, too, BTW.

    • Odelay42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I do the same thing. And I say, “it’s got a 20th century kind of vibe” about movies and music and stuff from the 80s and 90s.

      It’s true, but disorienting. I was born in 85.

  • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Back in the day, much of the fiction people saw was set in the past. You saw Marie Antoinette and Cleopatra in cartoons and commercials. Sup0erman met Sitting Bull. Today there are very few shows / movies set in the past, so people don’t have the same perspective.

    • The Picard Maneuver@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve noticed this too. It feels like we’re culturally losing touch with even the relatively recent past, and I’m not sure what to think about it.

      I guess it concerns me in the “those who fail to study history are doomed to repeat it” kind of way.

      • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Like so many things, it goes back to Ronald Reagan.

        Reagan loosened up the rules on children’s TV. That let the networks/advertisers run half hour long commercials with names like “GI Joe” and “Masters Of The Universe.” Back in the day, the folks writing Bugs Bunny could put anyone in a cartoon, but the new guys were being pushed to create characters that could be sold as toys. The same applies to movies. The studios would rather finance a science fiction movie with a dozen tie-in products than a historical picture that has a bunch of public domain characters.

        As always, look for the money trail.

        • El_Scapacabra@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah, the G.I. Joe and Transformer cartoons (and a lot more, I’m sure) were basically created to be commercials for the toys from the get go.