Star Trek Website
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml to Technology@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 年前

Chinese Sixth Generation Fighters Poised to Cut Pentagon Demand For F-35s: Lockheed Martin Stock Drops After New Jets’ Unveiling

militarywatchmagazine.com

external-link
message-square
104
link
fedilink
32
external-link

Chinese Sixth Generation Fighters Poised to Cut Pentagon Demand For F-35s: Lockheed Martin Stock Drops After New Jets’ Unveiling

militarywatchmagazine.com

☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml to Technology@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 年前
message-square
104
link
fedilink
Stock of the United States’ largest defence contractor Lockheed Martin was downgraded to Hold from Buy at Deutsche Bank by 14.5 percent, with a price target of $523
alert-triangle
You must log in or # to comment.
  • anachronist@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 年前

    Lockheed’s stock price fell because they missed on earnings. It’s batshit to think a new fighter coming out of China would be bad for Lockheed. 🤡

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      21
      ·
      1 年前

      A 6th gen fighter coming out of China while the US can’t make their 5th gen fighter work properly certainly does look bad for Lockheed.

      • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 年前

        F22 is working just fine. The new planes from China seem like tech demonstrators, so a similar stage to X35 in 2000. So they could still have plenty of production problems ahead of them.

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          21
          ·
          1 年前

          sure little buddy, you keep on coping there cause it’s adorable

          • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 年前

            Could you point to what issues your talking about? It’s hard to converse when you’re referring to vague vibes.

            • Atomic@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              13
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              1 年前

              He just straight up doesn’t know what he’s talking about. The only thing you’ll ever get out of him is west bad, China, Russia & North Korea good.

              Can just as well name his post lockheed stock drops after kindergarten teacher drinks water and it would be equally accurate.

              • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                14
                ·
                1 年前

                awww you’re such a sour little muffin aren’t you

                • Atomic@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  10
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  1 年前

                  Not at all. Just lowering the guys expectations of having a genuine conversation. Feel free to prove me wrong 😘

            • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              14
              ·
              1 年前

              The only one referring to vague vibes here is you bud. The disaster that is F22 is very well documented

              • https://www.nytimes.com/2019/08/21/magazine/f35-joint-strike-fighter-program.html
              • https://www.twz.com/28659/air-force-admits-f-22-raptors-wont-hit-80-percent-mission-capable-target-on-time
              • https://nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/air-forces-f-22-raptor-nightmare-explained-3-words-207364

              On the other hand, China has consistently shown the ability to produce things that actually work.

              • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 年前

                Jfs has been a cluster, they wanted a VTOL jet that do everything, which physics doesn’t like. But with 15 years extra development, they kinda did it.

                80% readiness is higher than most jets, my sources are actually showing loser, but still in line with other military jets.

                A-10 Thunderbolt II (67 percent) and the F-16C (69 percent), while significantly outperforming air superiority fighters like the F-15C (33 percent) and F-22 (52 percent). https://www.sandboxx.us/news/why-media-coverage-of-the-f-35-repeatedly-misses-the-mark/

                And is your third source just saying that the biggest problem with the F22 is that they want more of them? That hardly seems like a criticism of the plane itself.

                • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  1 年前

                  Jfs has been a cluster, they wanted a VTOL jet that do everything, which physics doesn’t like. But with 15 years extra development, they kinda did it.

                  In the same way the Cybertruck is kind of a truck.

                  80% readiness is higher than most jets, my sources are actually showing loser, but still in line with other military jets.

                  80% is not the readiness of F22, but a target they can’t hit.

                  And is your third source just saying that the biggest problem with the F22 is that they want more of them? That hardly seems like a criticism of the plane itself.

                  It’s a criticism of the abysmal production capability showing that these things are artisanally made.

      • anachronist@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 年前

        Cope how? I’m not a fan. The worst thing in the world for Lockheed would be if US’s adversaries decided they weren’t going to be designing any new weapons systems. Lockheed runs on fear of what’s next.

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          13
          ·
          1 年前

          Lockheed model of sucking up taxes without producing anything only works when the US feels they have superiority over the adversaries. Now that it’s becoming clear this is not the case, there will be a push to actually have to produce things that work, and Lockheed isn’t good at doing that.

          • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 年前

            Where in the world are you getting that Lockheed stuff doesn’t work? SR71? F104? U2? F117? F22?

            • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              13
              ·
              1 年前

              Oh man, I remember seeing this U2 in museum, it did a great job intercepting Soviet AD 😂 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1960_U-2_incident

              • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 年前

                You think the U2 was an intercepter?

                • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  1 年前

                  Removed by mod

              • signalsayge@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 年前

                And yet they have still been operational for 60 years after that… Funny that the U2 lasted longer than the Soviet Union.

                • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  1 年前

                  as a museum piece

      • VeganCheesecake@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 年前

        More advanced hardware from a country the US see as an adversary sounds like it should be great for the stock of Lockheed and Co., actually.

  • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 年前

    I’m not big into airframes but i think it’s a dieing artform making these jets. Some drone strapped to a pulse rocket will eventually make them all obsolete.

    The same can be said for small arms I guess.

    • MDCCCLV@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 年前

      It’s more about sensors and communication, there’s no reason you can’t have f35 use drones and stuff. But the better plane will see and target the enemy first. And it can operate without GPS. In other words it’s better to have 3000 f35s flying missions plus a bunch of drones. Being able to deliver a lot of firepower first is a huge deal.

  • ليتني كوري شمالي @lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 年前

    How do we know that the Chinese fighter jet is actually 6th gen and not say 5.999999… gen?

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 年前

      Also how are they stealing this tech from the future!

  • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 年前

    Strange that the analysis that this will decrease f35 demand. I guess they think it’ll switch to more ngad and less f35?

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      1 年前

      They’re saying that the military might shift focus to development of 6th gen fighters to catch up with China.

      • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 年前

        But Lockheed is a front runner for that too.

        • halyk.the.red@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 年前

          It’s in reference to international sales, I believe.

          • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 年前

            Why would they be impacted? What’s their competition?

            • halyk.the.red@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 年前

              Not sure the specifics, but I wouldn’t be surprised if there were countries interested in a next generation fighter jet, and is capable of buying from either the US or China.

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          13
          ·
          1 年前

          I’m sure it’ll be just as successful at sucking up billions in taxes with nothing to show for it.

          • leisesprecher@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 年前

            Producing literally hundreds of a single type of airplane with orders for the next decade or so isn’t exactly “nothing to show for”.

            And even if you discount the actual sales, getting billions in development budget from the US government is pretty good for business.

            • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              10
              ·
              1 年前

              I mean yeah, the purpose of these companies is to put taxes back into the pockets of billionaires instead of spending them on stuff they’re meant for like infrastructure, healthcare, education, and so on. That’s why majority Americans live like dogs.

              • leisesprecher@feddit.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                1 年前

                Opposed to the Chinese corporations which are famously basically charity organizations?

                What exactly is your point? Your moving goalposts to completely different planets.

                • Mac@federation.red
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  1 年前

                  It’s yogthos lol, can’t expect anything less my friend

                • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  6
                  ·
                  1 年前

                  China doesn’t use private sector for its military. Try to put a bit more work into your trolling.

          • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 年前

            Have you seen their performance in Iran recently? They seem really good air to ground.

            • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              1 年前

              You mean when Israel aborted the bulk of their attack because they got painted by radar?

              • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                1 年前

                No, I mean the one that took down nearly the entirety of Irans air defenses with less than 100 weapons.

                https://www.iranintl.com/en/202412054965

                • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  9
                  ·
                  1 年前

                  send me a dm cause I have a bridge to sell you 😂

      • MDCCCLV@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 年前

        F35 is guaranteed to be better than a “6th generation” Chinese plane and they can be upgraded anyway. And it’s actually very successful now with a very cheap per plane cost.

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 年前

          LMFAO

Technology@lemmy.ml

technology@lemmy.ml

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !technology@lemmy.ml

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 87 users / day
  • 681 users / week
  • 2.72K users / month
  • 6.57K users / 6 months
  • 97 local subscribers
  • 42.8K subscribers
  • 5.02K Posts
  • 52.2K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • MinutePhrase@lemmy.ml
  • BE: 0.19.19
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org